Back

Where has democracy helped the poor? Democratic transitions and early-life mortality at the country level.

Ramos, A. P.; Flores, M. J.; Ross, M.

2020-09-11 public and global health
10.1101/2020.09.09.20191502
Show abstract

The effects of democracy on living conditions among the poor are disputed. Previous studies have addressed this question by estimating the average effect of democracy on early-life mortality across all countries. We revisit this debate using a research design that distinguishes between the aggregated effects of democracy across all countries and their individual effects within countries. Using Interrupted Time Series methodology and estimating model parameters in a Bayesian framework, we find the average effect of democracy on early-life mortality to be close to zero, but with considerable variation at the country-level. Democratization was followed by fewer child deaths in 21 countries, an increase in deaths in eight, and no measurable changes in the remaining 32 cases. Transitions were usually beneficial in Europe, neutral or beneficial in Africa and Asia, and neutral or harmful in Latin America. The distribution of country-level effects is not consistent with common arguments about the conditional effects of democratic transitions. Our results open a new line of research into the sources of theses heterogeneous effects.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 22%
18.2%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · based on 100 published papers
Top 0.2%
29× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 13%
2.2× avg
4
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
#1
92× avg
5
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 4%
6.1× avg
6
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
7
BMJ Global Health
BMJ · based on 95 published papers
Top 7%
3.9× avg
8
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 13%
2.4× avg
9
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 32%
1.4%
10
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 19%
1.4%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 54 published papers
Top 4%
5.6× avg
12
Research Synthesis Methods
Wiley · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.8%
15× avg
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 16%
1.7× avg
14
Journal of Public Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 23 published papers
Top 3%
7.0× avg
15
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 11%
1.6× avg
16
European Journal of Public Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 20 published papers
Top 2%
8.6× avg
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · based on 84 published papers
Top 12%
1.8× avg
18
Nature
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 58 published papers
Top 10%
2.3× avg
19
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 22%
0.7%
20
SSM - Population Health
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 2%
9.5× avg
21
BMJ Public Health
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
22
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 23%
0.7%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
The Royal Society · based on 54 published papers
Top 4%
4.7× avg