Back

EEG Source Identification through Phase Space Reconstruction and Complex Networks

Zangeneh Soroush, M.

2020-09-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.09.08.287755 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artifact elimination has become an inseparable part while processing electroencephalogram (EEG) in most brain computer interface (BCI) applications. Scientists have tried to introduce effective and efficient methods which can remove artifacts and also reserve desire information pertaining to brain activity. Blind source separation (BSS) methods have been receiving a great deal of attention in recent decades since they are considered routine and standard signal processing tools and are commonly used to eliminate artifacts and noise. Most studies, mainly EEG-related ones, apply BSS methods in preprocessing sections to achieve better results. On the other hand, BSS methods should be followed by a classifier in order to identify artifactual sources and remove them in next steps. Therefore, artifact identification is always a challenging problem while employing BSS methods. Additionally, removing all detected artifactual components leads to loss of information since some desire information related to neural activity leaks to these sources. So, an approach should be employed to suppress the artifacts and reserve neural activity. In this study, a new hybrid method is proposed to automatically separate and identify electroencephalogram (EEG) sources with the aim of classifying and removing artifacts. Automated source identification is still a challenge. Researchers have always made efforts to propose precise, fast and automated source verification methods. Reliable source identification has always been of great importance. This paper addresses blind source separation based on second order blind identification (SOBI) as it is reportedly one of the most effective methods in EEG source separation problems. Then a new method for source verification is introduced which takes advantage of components phase spaces and their dynamics. A new state space called angle space (AS) is introduced and features are extracted based on the angle plot (AP) and Poincare planes. Identified artifactual sources are eliminated using stationary wavelet transform (SWT). Simulated, semi-simulated and real EEG signals are employed to evaluate the proposed method. Different simulations are performed and performance indices are reported. Results show that the proposed method outperforms most recent studies in this subject.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
3
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.2%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
10
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%