Back

MYD88 L265P mutation in primary central nervous system lymphoma is associated with better survival: A single centre experience.

Curran, O. E.; Poon, M. T. C.; Gilroy, L.; Torgersen, A.; Smith, C.; Al-Qsous, W.

2020-09-09 pathology
10.1101/2020.09.06.20185827
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Myeloid differentiation primary response gene (MYD88) mutation in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) may be associated with unfavourable prognosis, however the evidence remains limited. We aimed to comprehensively characterise PCNSLs by integration of clinicopathological, molecular, treatment and survival data. MethodsWe retrospectively identified and validated 57 consecutive patients with PCNSLs according to the 2017 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms over a 13-year period. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples underwent real-time allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assay to detect MYD88 mutation. We used multivariable Cox regression for survival analysis including age, treatment, and MYD88 as covariates. We searched the literature for studies reporting demographics, treatment, MYD88 and survival of PCNSL patients, and incorporated individual-patient data into our analyses. ResultsThe median age was 66 years and 56% were women. All 57 patients had non-germinal PCNSL and the majority (81%) received either single or combined therapies. There were 46 deaths observed over the median follow-up of 10 months. MYD88 mutation status was available in 41 patients of which 36 (88%) were mutated. There was an association between MYD88 mutation and better survival in the multivariable model (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.95; p=0.039) but not in a univariable model. After incorporating additional 18 patients from the literature, this association was reproducible (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.77, p=0.012). ConclusionsAdjusting for confounders, MYD88 mutation is associated with better survival. While further validation is warranted, identification of MYD88 mutation can identify patients who may benefit from novel targeted therapies. Key pointsO_LIMYD88 mutation is common in PCNSLs. C_LIO_LIMYD88 mutation in PCNSLs is associated with better survival after adjusting for age at diagnosis and treatment. C_LIO_LIIdentification of MYD88 mutation in PCNSLs can identify patients who may benefit from novel targeted therapies and enhance survival. C_LI Importance of the studyPCNSLs are rare and associated with lower survival than their systemic counterparts. The emergence of new molecular targets in PCNSLs, such as mutations in the MYD88 gene, offers hope for more effective therapeutics. Few studies have investigated the association between MYD88 mutation and survival. These studies, however, are limited by inconsistent inclusion of clinical variables and suboptimal analytic approach, such as overfitting model or incomplete adjustment for important confounders. Our study integrates treatment, molecular and survival data for 57 patients diagnosed with PCNSL. We demonstrate that without adequate adjustment for confounders such as age at diagnosis and treatment, MYD88 mutation does not affect survival. However, a multivariable survival model including these variables shows MYD88 mutation to be associated with better survival. While further validation of this association is warranted, our findings suggest that identification of MYD88 mutation can identify patients who may benefit from novel targeted therapies and enhance survival.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Acta Neuropathologica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Modern Pathology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
9.9%
4
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
7.4%
5
The American Journal of Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
5.2%
6
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Blood Advances
based on 16 papers
Top 0.4%
4.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 81%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 14%
2.2%
14
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 12%
1.5%
16
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
The Lancet
based on 16 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Gastroenterology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 36%
1.3%
20
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 46%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
26
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.7%