3DFAACTS-SNP: Using regulatory T cell-specific epigenomics data to uncover candidate mechanisms of Type-1 Diabetes (T1D) risk
Liu, N.; Sadlon, T.; Wong, Y. Y.; Pederson, S. M.; Breen, J.; Barry, S. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide association and fine-mapping studies have enabled the discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and other variants that are significantly associated with many autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, many of the SNPs lie in non-coding regions, limiting the identification of mechanisms that contribute to autoimmune disease progression. MethodsAutoimmunity results from a failure of immune tolerance, suggesting that regulatory T cells (Treg) are likely a significant point of impact for this genetic risk, as Treg are critical for immune tolerance. Focusing on T1D as a model of defective function of Treg in autoimmunity, we designed a SNPs filtering workflow called 3 Dimensional Functional Annotation of Accessible Cell Type Specific SNPs (3DFAACTS-SNP) that utilises overlapping profiles of Treg-specific epigenomic data (ATAC-seq, Hi-C and FOXP3-ChIP) to identify regulatory elements potentially driving the effect of variants associated with T1D, and the gene(s) that they control. ResultsUsing 3DFAACTS-SNP we identified 36 SNPs with plausible Treg-specific mechanisms of action contributing to T1D from 1,228 T1D fine-mapped variants, identifying 119 novel interacting regions resulting in the identification of 51 candidate target genes. We further demonstrated the utility of the workflow by applying it to three other fine-mapped/meta-analysed SNP autoimmune datasets, identifying 17 Treg-centric candidate variants and 35 interacting genes. Finally, we demonstrate the broad utility of 3DFAACTS-SNP for functional annotation of any genetic variation using all common (>10% allele frequency) variants from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identified 7,900 candidate variants and 3,245 candidate target genes, generating a list of potential sites for future T1D or autoimmune research. ConclusionsWe demonstrate that it is possible to further prioritise variants that contribute to T1D based on regulatory function and illustrate the power of using cell type specific multi-omics datasets to determine disease mechanisms. The 3DFAACTS-SNP workflow can be customised to any cell type for which the individual datasets for functional annotation have been generated, giving broad applicability and utility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Generation and network analysis of an RNA-seq transcriptional atlas for the rat. 94%
- IMGT(R) Analysis of the Human IGH Locus: Unveiling Novel Polymorphisms and Copy Number Variations in Genome Assemblies from Diverse Ancestral Backgrounds 93%
- Differential Expression Enrichment Tool (DEET): an interactive atlas of human differential gene expression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convolutional neural network model to predict causal risk factors that share complex regulatory features 94%
- Telomemore enables single-cell analysis of cell cycle and chromatin condensation 94%
- Genome-wide characterization of human minisatellite VNTRs: population-specific alleles and gene expression differences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of rare and common genetic variation in theInterleukin-1 pathway for human cytokine responses 95%
- Functional screen of Inflammatory Bowel Disease genes reveals key epithelial functions 94%
- Discovery of CD80 and CD86 as recent activation markers on regulatory T cells by protein-RNA single-cell analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS and 3D chromatin mapping identifies multicancer risk genes associated with hormone-dependent cancers 93%
- Deciphering novel TCF4-driven mechanisms underlying a common triplet repeat expansion-mediated disease 93%
- Wild-type bone marrow cells repopulate tissue resident macrophages and reverse the impacts of homozygous CSF1R mutation. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.