Back

SS-Detect: Development and Validation of a New Strategy for Source-Based Morphometry in Multi-Scanner Studies

Ge, R.; Ding, S.; Keeling, T.; Honer, W.; Frangou, S.; Vila-Rodriguez, F.

2020-10-28 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.09.03.282236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeSource-based morphometry (SBM) has been used in multi-centre studies pooling magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data across different scanners to advance the reproducibility of neuroscience research. In the present study, we developed an analysis strategy for Scanner-Specific Detection (SS-Detect) of SBPs in multi-scanner studies, and evaluated its performance relative to a conventional strategy. MethodsIn the first experiment, the SimTB toolbox was used to generate simulated datasets mimicking twenty different scanners with common and scanner-specific SBPs. In the second experiment, we generated one simulated SBP from empirical gray matter volume (GMV) datasets from two different scanners. Moreover, we applied two strategies to compare SBPs between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls GMV from two different scanners. ResultsThe outputs of the conventional strategy were limited to whole-sample-level results across all scanners; the outputs of SS-Detect included whole-sample-level and scanner-specific results. In the first simulation experiment, SS-Detect successfully estimated all simulated SBPs, including the common and scanner-specific SBPs whereas the conventional strategy detected only some of the whole-sample SBPs. The second simulation experiment showed that both strategies could detect the simulated SBP. Quantitative evaluations of both experiments demonstrated greater accuracy of the SS-Detect in estimating spatial SBPs and subject-specific loading parameters. In the third experiment, SS-Detect detected more significant between-group SBPs, and these SBPs corresponded with the results from voxel-based morphometry analysis, suggesting that SS-Detect has higher sensitivity in detecting between-group differences. ConclusionsSS-Detect outperformed the conventional strategy and can be considered advantageous when SBM is applied to a multi-scanner study.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.