Back

HPM Live μ for full CLEM workflow

Heiligenstein, X.; de Beer, M.; Heiligenstein, J.; Eyraud, F.; Manet, L.; Schmitt, F.; Lamers, E.; Lindenau, J.; Kea-te Lindert, M.; Salamero, J.; Raposo, G.; sommerdijk, N.; Belle, M.; Akiva, A.

2020-10-21 biophysics
10.1101/2020.09.03.281956 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the development of advanced imaging methods that took place in the last decade, the spatial correlation of microscopic and spectroscopic information - known as multimodal imaging or correlative microscopy (CM) - has become a broadly applied technique to explore biological and biomedical materials at different length scales. Among the many different combinations of techniques, Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy (CLEM) has become the flagship of this revolution. Where light (mainly fluorescence) microscopy can be used directly for the live imaging of cells and tissues, for almost all applications, electron microscopy (EM) requires fixation of the biological materials. Although sample preparation for EM is traditionally done by chemical fixation and embedding in a resin, rapid cryogenic fixation (vitrification) has become a popular way to avoid the formation of artefacts related to the chemical fixation/embedding procedures. During vitrification, the water in the sample transforms into an amorphous ice, keeping the ultrastructure of the biological sample as close as possible to the native state. One immediate benefit of this cryo-arrest is the preservation of protein fluorescence, allowing multi-step multi-modal imaging techniques for CLEM. To further explore the potential of cryo-fixation, we developed a high-pressure freezing (HPF) system that allows vitrification under different environmental parameters and applied it in different CLEM workflows. In this chapter, we introduce our novel HPF live instrument with a focus on its coupling to a light microscope. We elaborate on the optimization of sample preservation and the time needed to capture a biological event, going from live imaging to cryo-arrest using HPF. We will address the adaptation of HPF to novel correlation workflows related to the forthcoming transition from imaging 2D (cell monolayers) to imaging 3D samples (tissue) and the associated importance of homogeneous deep vitrification. Lastly, we will discuss the potential of our HPM within CLEM protocols especially for correlating live imaging using the Zeiss LSM900 with electron microscopy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
3
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
IUCrJ
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
12
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
25
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
28
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%