Back

Household Secondary Attack Rate in Gandhinagar district of Gujarat state from Western India

Shah, K.; Desai, N.; Saxena, D.; Mavalankar, D.; Mishra, U.; Patel, G. C.

2020-09-05 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.09.03.20187336
Show abstract

Objectives: Current retrospective study aims to evaluate household Secondary Attack Rate (SAR) of COVID-19 in Gandhinagar (rural) district of Gujarat, India. Methods: Line-listing of 486 laboratory-confirmed patients, tested between 28th March to 2nd July was collected, out of them 80 (15% of overall sample) cases were randomly selected. Demographic, clinical and household details of cases were collected through telephonic interview. During interview 28 more patients were identified from the same household and were added accordingly. So, study included 74 unrelated cluster of households with 74 primary cases and 386 close contacts. Results: SAR in household contacts of COVID-19 in Gandhinagar was 8.8%. Out of 108, 8 patients expired (7.4%), where higher mortality was observed in primary cases (9.5%) as compared to secondary cases (3%). Occupational analysis showed that majority of the secondary cases (88%) were not working and hence had higher contact time with patient. No out-of-pocket expenditure occurred in 94% of the patients, in remaining 6% average expenditure of 1,49,633INR (2027 USD) was recorded. Conclusions: Key observations from the study are 1) SAR of 8.8% is relatively low and hence home isolation of the cases can be continued 2) Primary case is more susceptible to fatal outcome as compared to secondary cases 3) Government has covered huge population of the COVID-19 patients under cost protection. However, more robust studies with larger datasets are needed to further validate the findings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 23%
18.0%
2
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 10%
3.1%
5
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
3.0%
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.6%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 5%
2.6%
8
IJID Regions
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 13%
2.4%
10
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 11%
2.4%
11
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 38%
2.0%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
2.0%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 12%
1.9%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 7%
1.9%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 5%
1.9%
16
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 13%
1.4%
19
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Journal of Public Health
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
based on 16 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
23
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
24
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Health Science Reports
based on 11 papers
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%