Back

Accurate transcription start sites enable mining for the cis-regulatory determinants of tissue specific gene expression

Ansariola, M.; Fraser, V. N.; Filichkin, S. A.; Ivanchenko, M. G.; Bright, Z. A.; Gould, R. A.; Ozguc, O. R.; O'Neil, S. T.; Megraw, M.

2020-09-02 genomics
10.1101/2020.09.01.278424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Across tissues, gene expression is regulated by a combination of determinants, including the binding of transcription factors (TFs), along with other aspects of cellular state. Recent studies emphasize the importance of both genetic and epigenetic states - TF binding sites and binding site chromatin accessibility have emerged as potentially causal determinants of tissue specificity. To investigate the relative contributions of these determinants, we constructed three genome-scale datasets for both root and shoot tissues of the same Arabidopsis thaliana plants: TSS-seq data to identify Transcription Start Sites, OC-seq data to identify regions of Open Chromatin, and RNA-seq data to assess gene expression levels. For genes that are differentially expressed between root and shoot, we constructed a machine learning model predicting tissue of expression from chromatin accessibility and TF binding information upstream of TSS locations. The resulting model was highly accurate (over 90% auROC and auPRC), and our analysis of model contributions (feature weights) strongly suggests that patterns of TF binding sites within [~]500 nt TSS-proximal regions are predominant explainers of tissue of expression in most cases. Thus, in plants, cis-regulatory control of tissue-specific gene expression appears to be primarily determined by TSS-proximal sequences, and rarely by distal enhancer-like accessible chromatin regions. This study highlights the exciting future possibility of a native TF site-based design process for the tissue-specific targeting of plant gene promoters.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.