Back

Variation in the Gut Microbiota of Common Marmosets: Differences with Colony of Origin and Integration

Cooper, R. E.; Mangus, L. M.; Lynch, J.; Schonvisky, K.; Wright, J.; McLimans, C. J.; Wong, H. T.; Chen See, J. R.; Lamendella, R.; Mankowski, J. L.

2020-09-01 microbiology
10.1101/2020.08.31.276733 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Characterization of the gut microbiome may aid understanding and management of natural and experimental disease states in research animals, thereby promoting reproducibility. In this study, the rectal bacterial communities of three separate common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) breeding colonies were defined using 16S rRNA sequencing of rectal swab samples. Study animals originated from two German colonies and a United States colony (JHU). The two German cohorts, previously fed the same diet, were imported into the JHU facility; they were then isolated, transitioned onto JHU diet, and then moved into rooms housing JHU animals. To dissect the contributions of diet and integration in shaping the rectal bacterial community, samples were collected from German origin marmosets upon JHU arrival (baseline), following diet transition (100 d), and following cohousing (390 d). Baseline and 390 d samples were collected from stably maintained JHU marmosets. Bacterial community composition was distinct between all three cohorts at baseline, suggesting that factors other than primary diet confer significant differences between captive populations. Beta-diversity of the animals from the two German colonies converged by 100 d but remained distinct from JHU sample beta-diversity throughout the 390-d study, indicating that diet had greater influence on bacterial community composition than did housing animals within the same room. Our results demonstrate substantial differences in gut bacteria between different captive marmoset colonies, with persistence of these differences following husbandry standardization and housing integration. Goals of rigor and reproducibility in research underscore the need to consider microbial differences between marmosets of diverse origin. ImportanceCharacterizing gut microbial populations is expected to promote health and enhance research reproducibility in animal studies. As use of common marmosets as animal models of human diseases expands, evaluating the marmoset gut bacterial community will be critical for interpreting research findings, especially as marmosets are prone to gastrointestinal inflammation. In this study, using 16S rRNA sequencing of rectal swab samples, we compared bacterial community among three captive colonies of marmosets at baseline and following importation of cohorts from two of the colonies into the third colony. Diet history had sustained influence on bacterial community composition, while housing the animals within the same room over a period of eight months did not appear to be a major factor. These persistent differences in marmoset gut bacterial community highlight the need for careful consideration of animal origin as a variable in marmoset research studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
8
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
18
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%