The ups and downs of amino acid co-evolution: evolutionary Stokes and anti-Stokes shifts
Youssef, N.; Susko, E.; Roger, A. J.; Bielawski, J. P.
Show abstract
The most fundamental form of epistasis occurs between residues within a protein. Epistatic interactions can have significant consequences for evolutionary dynamics. For example, a substitution to a deleterious amino acid may be compensated for by replacements at other sites which increase its propensity (a function of its average fitness) over time - this is the evolutionary Stokes shift. We discovered that an opposite trend -the decrease in amino acid propensity with time-can also occur via the same epistatic dynamics. We define this novel and pervasive phenomenon as the evolutionary anti-Stokes shift. Our extensive simulations of three natural proteins show that evolutionary Stokes and anti-Stokes shifts occur with similar frequencies and magnitudes across the protein. This high-lights that decreasing amino acid propensities, on their own, are not conclusive evidence of adaptive responses to a changing environment. We find that stabilizing substitutions are often permissive (i.e., expand potential evolutionary paths) whereas destabilizing substitutions are restrictive. We show how these dynamics explain the variations in amino acid propensities associated with both evolutionary shifts in propensities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Population Genetics of Collateral Resistance and Sensitivity 94%
- Price equation captures the role of drug interactions and collateral effects in the evolution of multidrug resistance 93%
- The protein domains of vertebrate species in whichselection is more effective have greater intrinsicstructural disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.