Back

Population Structure Discovery in Meta-Analyzed Microbial Communities and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Ma, S.; Shungin, D.; Mallick, H.; Schirmer, M.; Nguyen, L. H.; Kolde, R.; Franzosa, E.; Vlamakis, H.; Xavier, R.; Huttenhower, C.

2020-08-31 genomics
10.1101/2020.08.31.261214 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial community studies in general, and of the human microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in particular, have now achieved a scale at which it is practical to associate features of the microbiome with environmental exposures and health outcomes across multiple large-scale populations. This permits the development of rigorous meta-analysis methods, of particular importance in IBD as a means by which the heterogeneity of disease etiology and treatment response might be explained. We have thus developed MMUPHin (Meta-analysis Methods with a Uniform Pipeline for Heterogeneity in microbiome studies) for joint normalization, meta-analysis, and population structure discovery using microbial community taxonomic and functional profiles. Applying this method to ten IBD cohorts (5,151 total samples), we identified a single consistent axis of microbial associations among studies, including newly associated taxa such as Acinetobacter and Turicibacter detected due to the sensitivity of meta-analysis. Linear random effects models further revealed associations with medications, disease location, and interaction effects consistent within and between studies. Finally, multiple unsupervised clustering metrics and dissimilarity measures agreed on a lack of discrete microbiome "types" in the IBD gut microbiome. These results thus provide a benchmark for consistent characterization of the IBD gut microbiome and a general framework applicable to meta-analysis of any microbial community types.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.