Back

Student-focused development of a next-generation centrifuge force microscope

Tompkins, K. J.; Berscheid, E. T.; Venkatesh, N.; Andrew, A. J.; Beckman, A. P.; Esler, M. A.; Evans, A. C.; Everett, B. A.; Houtti, M.; Koo, H.; Litzau, L. A.; Nelson, A. T.; Peterson, T. M.; Reid, T. A.; Evans, R. L.; Gordon, W. R.

2020-08-31 biophysics
10.1101/2020.08.30.274373 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advanced biological molecule force probing methods such as atomic force microscopy and optical tweezers used to quantify forces at the single-molecule level are expensive and require extensive training and technical knowledge. However, the technologies underlying a centrifuge force microscope (CFM) are relatively straight forward, allowing for construction by labs with relatively low budgets and minimal training. Design ideas from previously constructed CFMs served as a guide in the development of this CFM. There were two primary goals: first, to develop an inexpensive, functional CFM using off-the-shelf and 3D printed parts; and second, to do so in the context of providing an educational experience for a broad range of students. The team included high school students and undergraduates from local high schools, the University of Minnesota, and other local higher education institutions. This project created an environment for student-focused development of the CFM that fostered active learning, individual ownership, as well as excellence in research. The instrument discussed herein represents a fully functional CFM designed and built by a postdoctoral researcher and a graduate student who together mentored several high school and undergraduate students. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEThe presented centrifuge force microscope (CFM) builds on features of existing designs specifically engineered for probing macromolecular force interactions at the single-molecule level. In the coming years, more versatile and modular CFM designs will be utilized in the force spectroscopy field, and the presented design is a step in that direction. In addition to constructing a functional instrument, true student ownership of the project design was equally an end goal. Students from high school through graduate school were included, and the project was structured so that everyone was seen as peers. This active learning project allowed students to acquire scientific concepts and techniques and apply them to real-life situations.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
European Biophysics Journal
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
4
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
11
The European Physical Journal E
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%