EEG Alpha Power Predicts the Temporal Sensitivity of Multisensory Integration
London, R. E.; Benwell, C. S.; Cecere, R.; Quak, M.; Thut, G.; Talsma, D.
Show abstract
Pre-stimulus EEG oscillations, especially in the alpha range (8-13 Hz), can affect the integration of stimulus features into a coherent percept. The effects of alpha power are often explained in terms of alphas inhibitory functions, whereas effects of alpha frequency have bolstered theories of discrete perceptual cycles, where the length of a cycle, or window of integration, is determined by alpha frequency. Such studies typically employ visual detection paradigms with near-threshold or even illusory stimuli. It is unclear whether such results generalize to above-threshold stimuli. Here, we recorded electroencephalography, while measuring temporal discrimination sensitivity in a temporal order judgement task using above-threshold auditory and visual stimuli. We tested whether pre-stimulus oscillations predict audio-visual temporal discrimination sensitivity on a trial-by-trial basis. By applying a jackknife procedure to link single-trial pre-stimulus oscillatory power and instantaneous frequency to psychometric measures, we identified two highly overlapping clusters over posterior sites. One where lower alpha power was associated with higher temporal sensitivity of audiovisual discrimination, and another where higher instantaneous alpha-frequency predicted higher temporal discrimination sensitivity. A follow-up analysis revealed that these effects were not independent, and that the effect of instantaneous frequency could be explained by power modulations in the lower alpha band. These results suggest that temporal sensitivity for above-threshold multisensory stimuli changes spontaneously from moment to moment and is likely related to fluctuations in cortical excitability. Moreover, our results caution against interpreting instantaneous frequency effects as independent from power effects if these effects overlap in time and space.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics of alpha suppression and enhancement may be related to resource competition in cross-modal cortical regions 97%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
- Neural responses to sensory novelty with and without conscious access 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implicit versus explicit timing - separate or shared mechanisms? 97%
- The Electrophysiological Markers of Statistically Learned Attentional Enhancement: Evidence for a Saliency Based Mechanism 97%
- Neural repetition suppression modulates time perception: evidence from electrophysiology and pupillometry 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Dynamics Underlying Successful Auditory Short-Term Memory Performance 97%
- To See, Not to See, or to See Poorly: Perceptual Quality and Guess Rate as a Function of Electroencephalography (EEG) Brain Activity in an Orientation Perception Task 97%
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.