Back

SARS-CoV-2 genomic and quasispecies analyses in cancer patients reveal relaxed intrahost virus evolution

Siqueira, J.; Goes, L. R.; Alves, B. M.; de Carvalho, P. S.; Cicala, C.; Arthos, J.; Viola, J. P. B.; de Melo, A. C.; Soares, M. A.; INCA COVID-19 Task Force (names of participants listed in the acknowledgements section number of cha,

2020-08-26 microbiology
10.1101/2020.08.26.267831 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Numerous factors have been identified to influence susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity. Cancer patients are more prone to clinically evolve to more severe COVID-19 conditions, but the determinants of such a more severe outcome remain largely unknown. We have determined the full-length SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences of cancer patients and healthcare workers (HCW; non-cancer controls) by deep sequencing and investigated the within-host viral quasispecies of each infection, quantifying intrahost genetic diversity. Naso- and oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2+ swabs from 57 cancer patients and 14 healthcare workers (HCW) from the Brazilian Cancer Institute were collected in April-May 2020. Complete genome amplification using ARTIC network V3 multiplex primers was performed followed by next-generation sequencing. Assemblies were conducted in Geneious R11, where consensus sequences were extracted and intrahost single nucleotide variants (iSNVs) were identified. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was performed using PhyMLv.3.0 and lineages were classified using Pangolin and CoV-GLUE. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all but one strain belonged to clade B1.1. Four genetically linked mutations known as the globally dominant SARS-CoV-2 haplotype (C241T, C3037T, C14408T and A23403G) were found in the majority of consensus sequences. SNV signatures of previously characterized Brazilian genomes were also observed in most samples. Another 85 SNVs were found at a lower frequency (1.4-19.7%). Cancer patients displayed a significantly higher intrahost viral genetic diversity compared to HCW (p = 0.009). Intrahost genetic diversity in cancer patients was independent of SARS-CoV-2 Ct values, and was not associated with disease severity, use of corticosteroids, or use of antivirals, characteristics that could influence viral diversity. Such a feature may explain, at least in part, the more adverse outcomes to which cancer/COVID-19 patients experience. Author SummaryCancer patients are more prone to clinically evolve to more severe COVID-19 conditions, but the determinants of such a more severe outcome remain largely unknown. In this study, phylogenetic and variation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes from cancer patients and non-cancer healthcare workers at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute were characterized by deep sequencing. Viral genomes showed signatures characteristic of Brazilian viruses, consistent with the hypothesis of local, community transmission rather than virus importation from abroad. Despite most genomes in patients and healthcare workers belonging to the same lineage, intrahost variability was higher in cancer patients when compared to non-cancer counterparts. The intrahost genomic diversity analysis presented in our study highlights the relaxed evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in a vulnerable population of cancer patients. The high number of minor variations can result in the selection of immune escape variants, resistance to potential drugs, and/or increased pathogenicity. The impact of this higher intrahost variability over time warrants further investigation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
3
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
24
Archives of Virology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%