Back

Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Algorithm for the Prediction of Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position in Cataract Surgery

Li, T.; Yang, K.; Stein, J.; Nallasamy, N.

2020-09-01 ophthalmology
10.1101/2020.08.26.20181156
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop a method for predicting postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) in cataract surgery patients based on preoperative biometry, demographics, and intraocular lens (IOL) power. MethodsPatients who underwent cataract surgery and had both preoperative and postoperative biometry measurements were included. Patient demographics and IOL power were collected from the Sight Outcomes Research Collaborative (SOURCE) database. A gradient boosting decision tree model was developed to predict the postoperative ACD. The mean absolute error (MAE) and median absolute error (MedAE) were used as evaluation metrics. The performance of the proposed method was compared to five existing formulas. Results847 patients were assigned randomly in a 4:1 ratio to a training/validation set (678 patients) and a testing set (169 patients). Using preoperative biometry and patient sex as predictors, the presented method achieved an MAE of 0.106 {+/-} 0.098 (SD) on the testing set, and a MedAE of 0.082. MAE was significantly lower than that of the five existing methods (p < 0.01). When keratometry was excluded, our method attained an MAE of 0.123 {+/-} 0.109, and a MedAE of 0.093. When IOL power was used as an additional predictor, our method achieved an MAE of 0.105 {+/-} 0.091 and a MedAE of 0.080. ConclusionsThe presented machine learning method achieved accuracy surpassing that of previously reported methods in the prediction of postoperative ACD. Translational RelevanceIncreasing accuracy of postoperative ACD prediction with the presented algorithm has the potential to improve refractive outcomes in cataract surgery.

Matching journals

1
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.1%
170× avg
2
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
#1
185× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 25%
17.0%
4
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 18%
1.7× avg
5
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
75× avg
6
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
70× avg
7
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 0.3%
17× avg
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
9
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 9%
2.9× avg
10
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 39%
1.7%
11
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
12
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 8%
2.7× avg
13
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
20× avg
14
British Journal of Cancer
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 22 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 7%
2.9× avg