Back

Single particle-resolution fluorescence microscopy of nanoplastics

Nguyen, B.; Tufenkji, N.

2020-08-26 ecology
10.1101/2020.08.25.267443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding of nanoplastic prevalence and toxicology is limited by imaging challenges resulting from their small size. Fluorescence microscopy is widely applied to track and identify microplastics in laboratory studies and environmental samples. However, conventional fluorescence microscopy, due to diffraction, lacks the resolution to precisely localize nanoplastics in tissues, distinguish them from free dye, or quantify them in environmental samples. To address these limitations, we developed techniques to label nanoplastics for imaging with Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy to achieve resolution at an order of magnitude superior to conventional fluorescence microscopy. These techniques include (1) passive sorption; (2) swell incorporation; and (3) covalent coupling of STED-compatible fluorescence dyes to nanoplastics. We demonstrate that our labeling techniques, combined with STED microscopy, can be used to resolve nanoplastics of different shapes and compositions as small as 50 nm. The longevity of the dye labeling is demonstrated in different media and conditions of biological and environmental relevance. We also test STED imaging of nanoplastics in exposure experiments with the model worm C. elegans. These techniques will allow more precise localization and quantification of nanoplastics in complex matrices. SynopsisWe show that Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy can be used to image single nanoplastics of different compositions and shapes. This will allow researchers to study environmentally-relevant nanoplastics and their interactions with organisms in relevant exposure scenarios. TOC Graphic O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.