Optimising tropical forest bird surveys using passive acoustic monitoring and repeated short-duration point counts
Metcalf, O. C.; Barlow, J.; Marsden, S.; Moura, N. G. d.; Berenguer, E.; Lees, A. C.
Show abstract
Estimation of avian biodiversity is a cornerstone measure of ecosystem condition, with turnover in avian community composition underpinning many studies of land-use change in tropical forests. Surveys conducted using autonomous recorders have been frequently found to be more efficient than traditional point-count surveys. However, there has been limited research into optimal survey duration, despite autonomous recordings allowing for many more repeats of short-duration surveys with relative ease in comparison to traditional survey methods. We use an acoustic dataset collected from a region of very high avian biodiversity - the eastern Brazilian Amazon - to test the effect of using short-duration surveys to increase temporal coverage without increasing total survey duration. We use this dataset to assess whether a survey protocol consisting of 240 15-second surveys at 29 locations, short-duration surveys, has an influence on resulting alpha and gamma diversity, and detection frequency, than standard-duration surveys of four 15-minute surveys per location. We find that repeated short-duration surveys outperform longer duration surveys in every metric considered herein, with short-duration surveys predicted to detect approximately 50% higher alpha diversity, and 10% higher gamma diversity. Short-duration surveys also detect species more often, at more survey locations. Conversely, standard-duration surveys are almost four times more likely to produce false negatives (i.e. to fail to detect species presence). Whilst there is no difference between the proportion of uncommon species detected by the two methods, when considering species detected multiple times at multiple locations, short-duration surveys detected three times more uncommon species than standard-duration surveys. We conclude that short-duration recorded surveys should be considered the primary method for sampling the species richness of bird communities in tropical forests and is likely to be preferable to longer duration or traditional surveys in most environments.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Montane Central Appalachian Forests Provide Refuge for the Critically Endangered Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis) 95%
- Eucalyptus cover as the primary driver of native forest bird reductions: evidence from a stand-scale analysis in NW Iberia 95%
- Leveraging Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) to Elucidate Forest Structural Conditions that Influence Eastern Whip-poor-will Abundance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 94%
- Decision analysis shows scientific and economic value of community-based monitoring in Madagascar 94%
- Defining endemism levels for biodiversity conservation: tree species in the Atlantic Forest hotspot 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bird communities in a selectively logged tropical montane forest are dominated by small, low-elevation species 96%
- Spatial behaviors and seasonal habitat use of the increasingly endangered thick-billed parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha) 94%
- Far-reaching displacement effects of artificial light at night in a North American bat community 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Change in liana density over 30 years in a Bornean rain forest supports the escape hypothesis 93%
- Contrasting effects of land cover on nesting habitat use and reproductive output for bumble bees 92%
- Arthropods on native versus alien woody plants: understanding variation across host plant taxonomy and geography 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.