A viral perspective on worldwide non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19
Rasigade, J.-P.; Barray, A.; Shapiro, J. T.; Coquisart, C.; Vigouroux, Y.; Bal, A.; Destras, G.; Vanhems, P.; Lina, B.; Josset, L.; Wirth, T.
Show abstract
Quantifying the effectiveness of large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 is critical to adapting responses against future waves of the pandemic. By combining phylogenetic data of 5,198 SARS-CoV-2 genomes with the chronology of non-pharmaceutical interventions in 57 countries, we examine how interventions and combinations thereof alter the divergence rate of viral lineages, which is directly related to the epidemic reproduction number. Home containment and education lockdown had the largest independent impacts and were predicted to reduce the reproduction number by 35% and 26%, respectively. However, we find that in contexts with a reproduction number >2, no individual intervention is sufficient to stop the epidemic and increasingly stringent intervention combinations may be required. Our phylodynamic approach can complement epidemiological models to inform public health strategies against COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-scale quantification and prediction of pathogenic stop codon readthrough by small molecules 95%
- Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions 95%
- Adenine DNA methylation associated to transcription is widespread across eukaryotes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Principles of dengue virus evolvability derived from genotype-fitness maps in human and mosquito cells 96%
- Revealing the structure of information flows discriminates similar animal social behaviors 96%
- Regulatory and coding sequences of TRNP1 co-evolve with brain size and cortical folding in mammals 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.