Back

Assessing extraction methods and diversity of anthocyanins from purple-fleshed sweet potatoes grown in cooler climates

Bennett, A. A.; Fan, K.; Moghe, G. D.

2020-08-24 plant biology
10.1101/2020.08.23.262808 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthocyanins are economically valuable phytochemicals of significant relevance to human health. Multiple fruit and vegetable sources for industrial-scale anthocyanin purification exist, however, each source has distinct anthocyanin levels and profiles conferred by modifications to the central anthocyanidin core. In this study, we assessed three purple-fleshed and one orange-fleshed cultivars of sweet potato, with the goal of studying their anthocyanin yield and diversity when this warm-weather crop is grown in cooler, northern latitudes. Comparison of multiple anthocyanin extraction methods revealed acidified ethanol extraction of lyophilized roots as the optimal method, producing a high, average yield of [~]800 mg anthocyanins/100g dry weight. Mass spectrometric analysis of sweet potato extracts identified eighteen high-confidence anthocyanins - all derived from peonidin and cyanidin cores - contributing to over 90% of the total anthocyanin signal. The concentrations of different anthocyanins were variable between the three purple-fleshed cultivars, while low anthocyanin accumulation was observed in the orange-fleshed cultivar. Further assessment of the untargeted high-resolution mass spectrometry data using MS/MS molecular networking revealed existence of low-abundance anthocyanins with delphinidin and pelargonidin cores, as well as over 250 peaks comprising of potential anthocyanins and flavonoids. These results provide a comprehensive insight into anthocyanin yields of purple-fleshed sweet potato grown in the northern latitudes and reveal the large diversity of anthocyanins and flavonoids in this popular crop.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.