Back

Role of interfering substances in the survival of coronaviruses on surfaces and their impact on the efficiency of hand and surface disinfection

Szpiro, L.; Pizzorno, A.; Durimel, L.; Julien, T.; Traversier, A.; Bouchami, D.; Marie, Y.; Rosa-Calatrava, M.; Terrier, O.; Moules, V.

2020-08-25 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.22.20180042 medRxiv
Show abstract

Contaminated environmental surfaces are considered to represent a significant vector for hospital-acquired viral infections. In this study, we have evaluated the impact of interfering substances on SARS-CoV-2 surface stability and virucidal efficiency of hand sanitizers and surface disinfectant. To this end, surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 was measured on stainless steel in different experimental conditions, with or without an artificial mucus/saliva mixture and compared against that of human coronavirus HCoV-229E and feline coronavirus FCoV. The impact of the mucus/saliva mixture on the virucidal efficiency of 3 commercial alcohol hand sanitizers and 1 surface chemical disinfectant against SARS-CoV-2, HCoV-229E and FCoV was then measured. Our results indicate that mucus/saliva mixture did not demonstrate a beneficial effect on the surface survival of tested viruses, with temperature being an important parameter. In addition, we demonstrated that interfering substances may play an important role in the virucidal efficacy of hand sanitizers and disinfectants, highlighting the need for adapted testing protocols that better reflect current "real life" conditions of use. HighlightsO_LIContaminated environmental surfaces are a significant vector for viral infections. C_LIO_LIWe studied the impact of interfering substances on SARS-CoV-2 surface stability and virucidal efficiency. C_LIO_LIMucus/saliva did not demonstrate a beneficial effect on viral surface stability, with temperature being an important parameter. C_LIO_LIInterfering substances are important for virucidal surface activity of disinfectants. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.