Hallucination of moving objects revealed by a dynamic noise background
Nakayama, R.; Holcombe, A. O.
Show abstract
We show that on a dynamic noise background, the perceived disappearance location of a moving object is shifted in the direction of motion. This "twinkle goes" illusion has little dependence on the luminance- or chromaticity-based confusability of the object with the background, or on the amount of background motion energy in the same direction as the object motion. This suggests that the illusion is enabled by the dynamic noise masking the offset transients that otherwise accompany an objects disappearance. While these results are consistent with an anticipatory process that pre-activates positions ahead of the objects current position, additional findings suggest an alternative account: a continuation of attentional tracking after the object disappears. First, the shift was greatly reduced when attention was divided between two moving objects. Second, the illusion was associated with a prolonging of the perceived duration of the object, by an amount that matched the extent of extrapolation inferred from the effect of speed on the size of the illusion (~50 ms). While the anticipatory extrapolation theory does not predict this, the continuation of attentional tracking theory does. Specifically, we propose that in the absence of offset transients, attentional tracking keeps moving for several tens of milliseconds after the target disappearance, and this causes one to hallucinate a moving object at the position of attention.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge-driven perceptual organization reshapes information sampling via eye movements 96%
- Temporal segmentation and 'look ahead' simulation: Physical events structure visual perception of intuitive physics 96%
- Object-Centered Spatial Learning in Dynamic Contexts: History-Driven Distractor Suppression and Target Enhancement 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.