The unintended consequences of inconsistent pandemic control policies
Althouse, B. M.; Wallace, B.; Case, B.; Scarpino, S. V.; Allard, A.; Berdhal, A.; White, E. R.; Hebert-Dufresne, L.
Show abstract
Controlling the spread of COVID-19 - even after a licensed vaccine is available - requires the effective use of non-pharmaceutical interventions, e.g., physical distancing, limits on group sizes, mask wearing, etc.. To date, such interventions have neither been uniformly nor systematically implemented in most countries. For example, even when under strict stay-at-home orders, numerous jurisdictions granted exceptions and/or were in close proximity to locations with entirely different regulations in place. Here, we investigate the impact of such geographic inconsistencies in epidemic control policies by coupling search and mobility data to a simple mathematical model of SARS-COV2 transmission. Our results show that while stay-at-home orders decrease contacts in most areas of the United States of America (US), some specific activities and venues often see an increase in attendance. Indeed, over the month of March 2020, between 10 and 30% of churches in the US saw increases in attendance; even as the total number of visits to churches declined nationally. This heterogeneity, where certain venues see substantial increases in attendance while others close, suggests that closure can cause individuals to find an open venue, even if that requires longer-distance travel. And, indeed, the average distance travelled to churches in the US rose by 13% over the same period. Strikingly, our mathematical model reveals that, across a broad range of model parameters, partial measures can often be worse than no measures at all. In the most severe cases, individuals not complying with policies by traveling to neighboring jurisdictions can create epidemics when the outbreak would otherwise have been controlled. Taken together, our data analysis and modelling results highlight the potential unintended consequences of inconsistent epidemic control policies and stress the importance of balancing the societal needs of a population with the risk of an outbreak growing into a large epidemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the importance and location of SARS-CoV-2 transmission events in large metropolitan areas 96%
- Intra-county modeling of COVID-19 infection with human mobility: assessing spatial heterogeneity with business traffic, age and race 95%
- Characterizing Population-level Changes in Human Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the rhythms of human activity in the built environment for airborne transmission risk: a large-scale analysis of mobility data 95%
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 93%
- COVID-19 clusters in schools: frequency, size, and transmission rates from crowdsourced exposure reports 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.