Back

Impressions of Vibrotactile Signals in Older Adults With and Without History of Stroke

Seim, C. E.; Ritter, B.; Flavin, K. E.; Lansberg, M. G.; Okamura, A. M.

2020-08-25 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2020.08.21.20179432
Show abstract

Vibrotactile feedback is mechanical stimulation produced using actuators in contact with the body. The stimulation parameters (frequency, amplitude, location, duration) can be adjusted to produce a variety of sensations. By characterizing how users respond to different settings, interaction designers can create more usable and enjoyable haptic interfaces. This form of haptic feedback is being used widely for alerts, gaming, and simulation; however, emerging technologies in the fields of brain health and physical therapy are introducing new users to this stimulation. For applications using vibrotactile stimulation to advance, researchers are studying perceived sensations and affective response. However, these studies often focus on healthy, younger users. It is well known that older adults and those with acquired brain injury have different physiology and different perception than young adults. Here we present a set of vibrotactile signals to adults over 40 years old with and without history of stroke and query affective impression and experienced sensations. Signals on the palm and those with a changing stimulus location were associated with higher valence ratings, while low-amplitude signals showed lowest arousal. Users preferred stimulation that they could perceive, and they could not perceive most signals applied to the forearm. Reported sensations include tickle, tingling, and numbness. CCS ConceptsHuman-centered computing [->] User studies; Haptic devices; Ubiquitous and mobile devices.

Matching journals

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
#1
144× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 26%
16.5%
3
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.2%
56× avg
4
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.2%
77× avg
5
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 4%
7.8× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 50%
3.0%
7
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 4%
5.5× avg
8
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
26× avg
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 1.0%
17× avg
10
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.8%
21× avg
11
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 7%
3.1× avg
12
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
15
Brain Stimulation
Elsevier BV · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
16
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
5.9× avg
17
iScience
Elsevier BV · based on 74 published papers
Top 5%
5.3× avg
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg
19
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
8.7× avg
20
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 4%
4.6× avg
21
DIGITAL HEALTH
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
22
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 39%
0.9%
23
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg
24
Advanced Science
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
8.5× avg