Back

A Case Study of Transfer of Lesion-Knowledge

Krishnan, S.; Khincha, R.; Vig, L.; Dash, T.; Srinivasan, A.

2020-08-22 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2020.08.19.20178210 medRxiv
Show abstract

All organs in the human body are susceptible to cancer, and we now have a growing store of images of lesions in different parts of the body. This, along with the acknowledged ability of neural-network methods to analyse image data, would suggest that accurate models for lesions can now be constructed by a deep neural network. However an important difficulty arises from the lack of annotated images from various parts of the body. Our proposed approach to address the issue of scarce training data for a target organ is to apply a form of transfer learning: that is, to adapt a model constructed for one organ to another for which there are minimal or no annotations. After consultation with medical specialists, we note that there are several discriminating visual features between malignant and benign lesions that occur consistently across organs. Therefore, in principle, these features boost the case for transfer learning on lesion images across organs. However, this has never been previously investigated. In this paper, we investigate whether lesion knowledge can be transferred across organs. Specifically, as a case study, we examine the transfer of a lesion model from the brain to lungs and lungs to the brain. We evaluate the efficacy of transfer of a brain-lesion model to the lung, and the transfer of a lung-lesion model to the brain by comparing against a model constructed: (a) without model-transfer (i.e.random weights); and (b) using model-transfer from a lesion-agnostic dataset (ImageNet). In all cases, our lesion models perform substantially better. These results point to the potential utility of transferring lesionknowledge across organs other than those considered here.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.