Back

Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening with Polygenic Risk Score

Tasa, T.; Puustusmaa, M.; Tonisson, N.; Kolk, B.; Padrik, P.

2020-08-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2020.08.19.20177931 medRxiv
Show abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in women and third most common cancer in men. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic variants (SNPs) independently associated with CRC. The effects of such SNPs can be combined into a single polygenic risk score (PRS). Stratification of individuals according to PRS could be introduced to primary and secondary prevention. Our aim was to combine risk stratification of a sex-specific PRS model with recommendations for individualized CRC screening. Previously published PRS models for predicting the risk of CRC were collected from the literature. These were validated on the UK Biobank (UKBB) consisting of a total of 458 696 quality-controlled genotypes with 1810 and 1348 prevalent male cases, and 2410 and 1810 incident male and female cases. The best performing sex-specific model was selected based on the AUC in prevalent data and independently validated in the incident dataset. Using Estonian CRC background information, we performed absolute risk simulations and examined the ability of PRS in risk stratifying individual screening recommendations. The best-performing model included 91 SNPs. The C-index of the best performing model in the dataset was 0.613 (SE = 0.007) and hazard ratio (HR) per unit of PRS was 1.53 (1.47 - 1.59) for males. Respective metrics for females were 0.617 (SE = 0.006) and 1.50 (1.44 - 1.58). PRS risk simulations showed that a genetically average 50-year-old female doubles her risk by age 58 (55 in males) and triples it by age 63 (59 in males). In addition, the best performing PRS model was able to identify individuals in one of seven groups proposed by Naber et al. for different coloscopy screening recommendation regimens. We have combined PRS-based recommendations for individual screening attendance. Our approach is easily adaptable to other nationalities by using population-specific background data of other genetically similar populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
3
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%