Back

Acute Pericarditis Diagnostic Score Development in Patients Admitted for Chest Pain

Meireles, A. C.; Oliveira, J. V. M. P.; Pontes, B. d. S. B.; Souza, A. C.; Gomes, L. C. O. S. B.; Silva, T. E. A.; Melo, M. H. V. d.; Bagano, G. O.; Rabelo, M. M. N.; Correia, L. C. L.

2020-08-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.08.19.20176750 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the presence of clinical, laboratory and electrocardiographic characteristics suggestive of acute pericarditis, there is no multivariate diagnostic score developed for this condition. ObjectiveTo develop a clinical score for diagnosis of pericarditis as the cause of acute chest pain, using data from admission. MethodsIn a diagnostic case-control study, we compared consecutive 45 patients of the Chest Pain Registry diagnosed of pericarditis (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or the presence of pleural effusion in echocardiography) versus 90 patients with an alternative confirmed diagnosis, randomly selected from our registry. Six clinical characteristics, 16 chest pain characteristics and 4 additional tests were candidates as predictors. Logistic regression was used to derivate a model composed by independent predictors of pericarditis. ResultsAmong 17 variables associated with pericarditis, 5 remained independent predictors: age; pain aggravation with thorax movement; positive troponin; diffuse ST-segment elevation and C-reactive protein. Each independent predictor was attributed points proportional to its regression coefficient. The final score presented discriminatory capacity represented by C-statistic of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93 - 1.0). The best cutoff point was defined as > 6 points, with sensitivity of 96% (95% CI = 85 - 100), specificity of 87% (95% CI = 78 - 93), positive likelihood ratio of 7.2 (95% CI = 4.2 - 12) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01 - 0.2). ConclusionThe proposed multivariate score seems to be accurate for the diagnosis of pericarditis and require further validation in an independent sample.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.