Acute Pericarditis Diagnostic Score Development in Patients Admitted for Chest Pain
Meireles, A. C.; Oliveira, J. V. M. P.; Pontes, B. d. S. B.; Souza, A. C.; Gomes, L. C. O. S. B.; Silva, T. E. A.; Melo, M. H. V. d.; Bagano, G. O.; Rabelo, M. M. N.; Correia, L. C. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite the presence of clinical, laboratory and electrocardiographic characteristics suggestive of acute pericarditis, there is no multivariate diagnostic score developed for this condition. ObjectiveTo develop a clinical score for diagnosis of pericarditis as the cause of acute chest pain, using data from admission. MethodsIn a diagnostic case-control study, we compared consecutive 45 patients of the Chest Pain Registry diagnosed of pericarditis (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or the presence of pleural effusion in echocardiography) versus 90 patients with an alternative confirmed diagnosis, randomly selected from our registry. Six clinical characteristics, 16 chest pain characteristics and 4 additional tests were candidates as predictors. Logistic regression was used to derivate a model composed by independent predictors of pericarditis. ResultsAmong 17 variables associated with pericarditis, 5 remained independent predictors: age; pain aggravation with thorax movement; positive troponin; diffuse ST-segment elevation and C-reactive protein. Each independent predictor was attributed points proportional to its regression coefficient. The final score presented discriminatory capacity represented by C-statistic of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93 - 1.0). The best cutoff point was defined as > 6 points, with sensitivity of 96% (95% CI = 85 - 100), specificity of 87% (95% CI = 78 - 93), positive likelihood ratio of 7.2 (95% CI = 4.2 - 12) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01 - 0.2). ConclusionThe proposed multivariate score seems to be accurate for the diagnosis of pericarditis and require further validation in an independent sample.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Disease Severity and Determinants among Ethiopian Patients: A study of the Millennium COVID-19 Care Center 93%
- A case-control study evaluating CT signs of xiphoid process associated with xiphodynia 93%
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 94%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 92%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning-based Mortality Prediction for Pediatric Fulminant Myocarditis Using Cytokine Profiles 94%
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 93%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Long-Term Mortality in Pericarditis: A Real-World Study 95%
- Heart Rate n-Variability (HRnV) and Its Application to Risk Stratification of Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department 93%
- Identification of candidate biomarkers and therapeutic agents for heart failure by bioinformatics analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.