COVID-19: Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions in the United States before Phased Removal of Social Distancing Protections Varies by Region
Pan, W.; Tyrovolas, S.; Gine Vazquez, I.; Raj, R.; Fernandez, D.; Zaitchik, B.; Lantos, P.; Woods, C. W.
Show abstract
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in January 2020, there is no quantified effect size for non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) to control the outbreak in the continental US. Objective. To quantify national and sub-national effect sizes of NPIs in the US. Design. This is an observational study for which we obtained daily county level COVID-19 cases and deaths from January 22, 2020 through the phased removal of social distancing protections. A stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial (SW-CRT) analytical approach is used, leveraging the phased implementation of policies. Data include 3142 counties from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Exposures. County-level NPIs were obtained from online county and state policy databases, then classified into four intervention levels: Level 1 (low) - declaration of a State of Emergency; Level 2 (moderate) - school closures, restricting nursing home access, or closing restaurants and bars; Level 3 (high) - non-essential business closures, suspending non-violent arrests, suspending elective medical procedures, suspending evictions, or restricting mass gatherings of at least 10 people; and Level 4 (aggressive) - sheltering in place / stay-at-home, public mask requirements, or travel restrictions. Additional county-level data were obtained to record racial (Black, Hispanic), economic (educational level, poverty), demographic (rural/urban) and climate factors (temperature, specific humidity, solar radiation). Main Outcomes. The primary outcomes are rates of COVID-19 cases, deaths and case doubling times. NPI effects are measured separately for nine US Census Region (Pacific, Mountain, West North Central, East North Central, West South Central, East South Central, South Atlantic, Middle Atlantic, New England). Results. Aggressive NPIs (level 4) significantly reduced COVID-19 case and death rates in all US Census Regions, with effect sizes ranging from 4.1% to 25.7% and 5.5% to 25.5%, respectively, for each day they were active. No other intervention level achieved significance across all US Regions. Intervention levels 3 and 4 both increased COVID-19 doubling times, with effects peaking at 25 and 40 days after initiation of each policy, respectively. The effectiveness of level 3 NPIs varied, reducing case rates in all regions except North Central states, but associated with significantly higher death rates in all regions except Pacific states. Intervention levels 1 and 2 did not indicate any effect on COVID-19 propagation and, in some regions, these interventions were associated with increased COVID-19 cases and deaths. Heterogeneity of NPI effects are associated with racial composition, poverty, urban-rural environment, and climate factors. Conclusion. Aggressive NPIs are effective tools to reduce COVID-19 propagation and mortality. Reducing social and environmental disparities may improve NPI effects in regions where less strict policies are in place.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Public Preferences for Social Distancing Behaviors to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19: A Discrete Choice Experiment 94%
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 93%
- Violence, firearms, and the coronavirus pandemic: Findings from the 2020 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Covid-19 Incidence and Mortality in the United States 93%
- State-level variation of initial COVID-19 dynamics in the United States: The role of local government interventions 93%
- Spatiotemporal Analysis of Medical Resource Deficiencies in the U.S. under COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rethinking Depression in Cities: Evidence and Theory for Lower Rates in Larger Urban Areas 91%
- Avoiding versus contracting COVID-19: On the effectiveness of social distancing at the level of the individual 90%
- Characterizing Population-level Changes in Human Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 92%
- Predicting Mobile Health Clinic Utilization for COVID-19 Vaccination in South Carolina: A Statistical Framework for Strategic Resource Allocation 91%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 94%
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 93%
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.