Back

Bayesian Spatio-Temporal Modeling of COVID-19: Inequalities on Case-Fatality Risk

Polo, G.; Mera Acosta, C.; Soler-Tovar, D.; Porras Villamil, J. F.; Palencia, N. P.; Penagos, M.; Meza Martinez, J.; Bobadilla, J. N.; Martin, L. V.; Duran, S.; Rodriguez Alvarez, M.; Meza Carvajalino, C.; Villamil, L. C.; Benavides Ortiz, E.

2020-08-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.18.20171074
Show abstract

The ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 challenges health systems and epidemiological responses of all countries worldwide. Although mitigation measures have been globally considered, the spatial heterogeneity of its effectiveness is evident, underscoring global health inequalities. Using Bayesian-based Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations, we evidenced that factors contributing to poverty are also risk factors for COVID-19 case-fatality, and unexpectedly, their impact on the case-fatality risk is comparable to that produced by health factors. Additionally, we confirm that both case-fatality risk and multidimensional poverty index have a heterogeneous spatial distribution, where the lastest consists of health, educational, dwelling, and employment dimensions. Spatio-temporal analysis reveals that the spatial heterogeneity in case-fatalities is associated with the percentage contribution of the health (RR 1.89 95%CI=1.43-2.48) and dwelling (RR 2.01 95%CI=1.37-2.63) dimensions to the multidimensional poverty, but also with the educational (RR 1.21 95%CI=1.03-1.49), and employment (RR 1.23 95%CI=1.02-1.47) dimensions. This spatial correlation indicates that the case-fatality risk increase by 189% and 201% in regions with a higher contribution of the health dimension (i.e., lack of health insurance and self-reporting) and dwelling dimension (i.e., lack of access to safe water, inadequate disposal of human feces, poor housing construction, and critical overcrowding), respectively. Furthermore, although a temporal decrease is evident, the relative risk of dying by COVID-19 in Colombia is still 200% higher than the established case-fatality risk based on the COVID-19 dynamics in Italy and China. These findings assist policy-makers in the spatial and temporal planning of strategies focused on mitigating the case-fatality risk in most vulnerable communities and preparing for future pandemics by progressively reducing the factors that generate health inequality.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 23%
17.9%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 20%
8.0%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 3%
5.6%
4
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 0.5%
4.7%
6
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 6%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 9%
3.0%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
9
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
13
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 33%
1.4%
17
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physics
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
20
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 27%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
22
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
23
One Health
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
25
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 13%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 14%
0.7%