Back

Mitochondrial determinants of response and resistance to venetoclax plus cytarabine duplet therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Bosc, C.; Gadaud, N.; Bousard, A.; Sabatier, M.; Cognet, G.; Saland, E.; Farge, T.; Boet, E.; Gotanegre, M.; Aroua, N.; Mouchel, P.-L.; Larrue, C.; Jarrou, L.; Rambow, F.; Cabon, F.; Nicot, N.; Vergez, F.; Tamburini, J.; Fournie, J.-J.; Kaoma, T.; Marine, J.-C.; Recher, C.; Stuani, L.; Joffre, C.; Sarry, J.-E.

2020-08-17 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.08.17.253856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of resistance to conventional and targeted therapy represents a major clinical barrier in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We show that the resistance to cytarabine (AraC) and its associated mitochondrial phenotype were reversed by genetic silencing or pharmacological inhibition of BCL2 in a caspase-dependent manner. BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) enhancement of AraC efficacy was independent of differentiation phenotype, a characteristic of response to another combination of VEN with hypomethylating agents (HMA). Furthermore, transcriptional profiles of patients with low response to VEN+AraC mirrored those of low responders to VEN+HMA in clinical trials. OxPHOS was found to be a patient stratification marker predictive of effective response to VEN+AraC but not to VEN+AZA. Importantly, whereas three cell subpopulations specifically emerged in VEN+AraC residual disease and were characterized by distinct developmental and transcriptional programs largely driven by MITF, E2F4 and p53 regulons, they each encoded proteins involved in assembly of NADH dehydrogenase complex. Notably, treatment of VEN+AraC-persisting AML cells with an ETCI inhibitor significantly increased the time-to-relapse in vivo. These findings provide the scientific rationale for new clinical trials of VEN+AraC combinations, especially in patients relapsing or non-responsive to chemotherapy, or after failure of frontline VEN+HMA regimen.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.