Back

LinCoM: a graph theoretic approach for the production of Linear place fields in Complex Mazes

Papasavvas, C. A.

2020-10-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.08.17.253849 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies on spatial coding and episodic memory typically involve recordings of hippocampal place cell activity while rodents navigate in mazes. Linear place fields serve as reduced representations of the activity of place cells, revealing their spatial preference along the tracks of the maze. Sometimes, the experimental designs include complex mazes with irregular geometries and one or more decision points. Unfortunately, in such complex mazes, the production of linear place fields becomes a non-trivial problem. Here, I present a MATLAB toolbox which implements a graph-theoretic approach for the efficient production of linear place fields in a variety of complex mazes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
27.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
○ 122 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
○ 41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.1%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
9
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.5%
10
Neuroinformatics
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Journal of Open Source Software
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.4%
13
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Neural Networks
○ 35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
17
Neural Computation
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Current Protocols
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Nature Protocols
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Network Neuroscience
● 126 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Hippocampus
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
STAR Protocols
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
25
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.