Two forms of isometric muscle function: Interpersonal motor task supports a distinction between a holding and a pushing isometric muscle action
Schaefer, L. V.; Bittmann, F. N.
Show abstract
In sports and movement sciences isometric muscle function is measured by pushing against a stable resistance. However, subjectively one can hold or push isometrically. Several investigations suggest a distinction of those forms. The aim of this study was to investigate, whether or not these two forms of isometric muscle action can be distinguished by objective parameters in an interpersonal setting. 20 subjects were grouped in 10 same sex pairs, in which one partner should perform the pushing isometric muscle action (PIMA) and the other partner executed the holding isometric muscle action (HIMA). The partners were coupled by an interface including a strain gauge and an acceleration sensor. The mechanical oscillations of the triceps brachii (MMGtri) muscle, its tendon (MTGtri) and the abdominal muscle (MMGobl) were recorded by piezoelectric-sensor-based measurement system (mechanomyography (MMG); mechanotendography (MTG)). Each partner performed three 15s (80% MVIC) and two fatiguing trials (90% MVIC) during PIMA and HIMA, respectively (tasks changed in the couple). Regarded parameters to compare PIMA and HIMA were (1) the mean frequency, (2) the normalized mean amplitude, (3) the amplitude variation, (4) the power in the frequency range of 8 to 15 Hz and (5) a special power-frequency ratio and the number of task failures during HIMA or PIMA (partner who quit the task). A "HIMA failure" occurred in 87.5% of trials (p<0.000). No significant differences between PIMA and HIMA were found for the mean frequency and normalized amplitude. The MMGobl showed a significantly higher values of the amplitude variation (15s: p 0.013; fatigue: p=0.007) and of the power-frequency-ratio (15s: p = 0.040; fatigue: p = 0.002) during HIMA and a higher power in the range of 8 to 15 Hz during PIMA (15s: p=0.001; fatigue: p=0.011). MMGtri and MTGtri showed no significant differences. Based on the findings it is suggested that a holding and a pushing isometric muscle action can be distinguished objectively, whereby a more complex neural control is assumed for HIMA.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of practice on a mechanical horse with an online feedback on performing a sitting postural coordination 97%
- Increase trajectories of tendon micro vibration intensity during ankle plantar flexion: A longitudinal data analysis using latent curve models 97%
- Are isokinetic leg torques and kick velocity reliable predictors for competitive success in taekwondo athletes? 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- RACLET: the Ramp Above Critical Level Endurance Test to evaluate critical force in isometric task. 95%
- Differential changes in the effective neural drive following new motor skill acquisition between vastus lateralis and medialis 94%
- Perception of effort during an isometric contraction is influenced by prior muscle lengthening or shortening 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 97%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 95%
- Proprioceptive and visual motion detection acuity contribute to children dynamic postural control 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective Assessments of a Short-duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue before Physical Exercise 97%
- Comparing algorithms for assessing upper limb use with inertial measurement units 95%
- Physical fitness and motor competence performance characteristics of elite Chinese youth athletes from four track and field throwing disciplines - a cross sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 96%
- Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 95%
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units in active range of motion assessment in the hip joint 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.