Data-Driven Development of a Small-Area COVID-19 Vulnerability Index for the United States
amram, o.; Amiri, S.; Thorn, E. L.; Mansfield, J. J.; Mellacheruvu, P.; Monsivais, P.
Show abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to surge in the United States, it has become clear that infection risk is higher in certain populations, particularly socially and economically marginalized groups. Social risk factors, together with other demographic and community characteristics, may reveal local variations and inequities in COVID risk that could be useful for targeting testing and interventions. Yet to date, rates of infection and estimations of COVID risk are typically reported at the county and state level. In this study we develop a small area vulnerability index based on publicly-available sociodemographic data and 668,428 COVID diagnoses reported in 4,803 ZIP codes in the United States (15% of all ZIP codes). The outcome was COVID-19 diagnosis rates per 100,000 people by ZIP code. Explanatory variables included sociodemographic characteristics obtained from the 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Bayesian multivariable techniques were used to capture complexities of spatial data and spatial autocorrelation and identify individual risk factors and derive their respective weights in the index. COVID-19 diagnosis rates varied from zero to 29,508 per 100,000 people. The final vulnerability index showed that higher population density, higher percentage of noninsured, nonwhite race and Hispanic ethnicity were positively associated with COVID-19 diagnosis rates. Our findings indicate disproportionate risk of COVID-19 infection among some populations and validate and expand understanding of these inequities, integrating several risk factors into a summary index reflecting composite vulnerability to infection. This index can provide local public health and other agencies with evidence-based metrics of COVID risk at a geographical scale that has not been previously available to most US communities.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How Timing of Stay-at-home Orders and Mobility Reductions Impacted First-Wave COVID-19 Deaths in US Counties 93%
- Missing data and missed infections: Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts 92%
- Estimating the Effect of Social Distancing Interventions on COVID-19 in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November, 2020 94%
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Observed COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate Among the U.S. Population 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential and rural-urban disease burden disparities across Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, March 2020 — May 2021 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 94%
- Identifying communities at risk for COVID-19-related burden across 500 U.S. Cities and within New York City 92%
- Modeling COVID-19 latent prevalence to assess a public health intervention at a state and regional scale 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 94%
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 93%
- Public Mobility Data Enables COVID-19 Forecasting and Management at Local and Global Scales 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.