ESTIMATING PREVALENCE AND TIME COURSE OF SARS-CoV-2 BASED ON NEW HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS AND PCR TESTS
Gonzalez, J. E.
Show abstract
Data posted in the COVID 19 tracking website for RT-PCR (PCR) results and hospital admissions are used to estimate the time course of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the United States (1) and individual states. Hospital admissions mitigate positive sampling bias in PCR tests since these were limited in numbers initially. Additionally, their intent was as a diagnostic rather than a surveying tool. By September 17, the United States cumulative recovered population is estimated at 45% or 149 million. The remaining susceptible population is 55%, or 50%, excepting the currently infected 5% population. The estimated mortality rate of the cumulative of the total affected population is 0.13% death. States have followed diverse epidemic time courses. New Jersey and New York show SARS-CoV-2 prevalence of 95% and 82%, respectively. Likewise, each state exhibits relatively low current positive PCR results at 1.2 % and 0.8%. Also, these states show about twice the mortality rate of the nation. By comparison, Florida, California, and Texas showed recovered populations percent around 50%, and higher current PCR positive test results ranging from 5% to 9%. This novel approach provides an improved source of information on the pandemics full-time course in terms of precision and accuracy in contrast to serological testing, which only views a narrow time slice of its history due to the transient nature of the antibody response and its graduated expression dependency on the severity of the disease. The deficiency of serological testing to estimate the recovered population is made even more acute due to the large proportion of asymptomatic and sub-clinical cases in the COVID-19 pandemic (2,3). T-cell testing, reputedly capable of long-term detection of previously infected individuals, will provide a complete view of the recovered population when it becomes available for large scale use. This New Hospital Admission based method informs a more effective and efficient deployment of a vaccination program since it provides not only a reliable estimate of the susceptible population by state, but it can also provide visibility down to the county level based on COVID-19 hospitalization record independent of PCR testing.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Reduced S-gene Target Performance and Failure for Rapid Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants 93%
- Reliability of COVID-19 data: An evaluation and reflection 93%
- A novel assessment method for COVID-19 humoral immunity duration using serial measurements in naturally infected and vaccinated subjects 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are commercial antibody assays substantially underestimating SARS-CoV-2 ever infection? An analysis on a population-based sample in a high exposure setting 92%
- Evaluation of the Access Bio CareStart™ rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in asymptomatic individuals tested at a community mass-testing program in Western Massachusetts 92%
- Distinct SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Reactivity Patterns in Coronavirus Convalescent Plasma Revealed by a Coronavirus Antigen Microarray 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern identifying a cluster of B.1.1.28/P.1 variant in British Columbia, Canada 92%
- Large-scale screening of asymptomatic for SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and rapid P.1 takeover, Curitiba, Brazil 91%
- Intercontinental movement of H5 2.3.4.4 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) to the United States, 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining antibody markers for serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 to estimate seroprevalence and time-since-infection 92%
- Charting Elimination in the Pandemic: A SARS-CoV-2 Serosurvey of Blood Donors in New Zealand 91%
- Excess Mortality in the United States During the First Three Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.