Canonical EEG Microstate Dynamic Properties and Their Associations with fMRI Signals at Resting Brain
Al Zoubi, O.; Misaki, M.; Tsuchiyagaito, A.; Mayeli, A.; Zotev, V.; Tulsa 1000 Investigators, ; Refai, H.; Paulus, M. P.; Bodurka, J.
Show abstract
Electroencephalography microstates (EEG-ms) capture and reflect the spatio-temporal neural dynamics of the brain. A growing literature is employing EEG-ms-based analyses to study various mental illnesses and to evaluate brain mechanisms implicated in cognitive and emotional processing. The spatial and functional interpretation of the EEG-ms is still being investigated. Previous works studied the association of EEG-ms time courses with blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal and suggested an association between EEG-ms and resting-state networks (RSNs). However, the distinctive association between EEG-ms temporal dynamics and brain neuronal activities is still not clear, despite the assumption that EEG-ms are an electrophysiological representation of RSNs activity. Recent works suggest a role for brain spontaneous EEG rhythms in contributing to and modulating canonical EEG-ms topographies and determining their classes (coined A through D) and metrics. This work simultaneously utilized EEG and fMRI to understand the EEG-ms and their properties further. We adopted the canonical EEG-ms analysis to extract three types of regressors for EEG-informed fMRI analyses: EEG-ms direct time courses, temporal activity per microstate, and pairwise temporal transitions among microstates (the latter two coined activity regressors). After convolving EEG-ms regressors with a hemodynamic response function, a generalized linear model whole-brain voxel-wise analysis was conducted to associate EEG-ms regressors with fMRI signals. The direct time course regressors replicated prior findings of the association between the fMRI signal and EEG-ms time courses but to a smaller extent. Notably, EEG-ms activity regressors were mostly anticorrelated with fMRI, including brain regions in the somatomotor, visual, dorsal attention, and ventral attention fMRI networks with no significant overlap for default mode, limbic or frontoparietal networks. A similar pattern emerged in using the transition regressors among microstates but not in self-transitions. The relatively short duration of each EEG-ms and the significant association of EEG-ms activity regressors with fMRI signals suggest that EEG-ms manifests successive transition from one brain functional state to another rather than being associated with specific brain functional state or RSN networks.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Principal component analysis reveals multiple consistent responses to naturalistic stimuli in children and adults 96%
- Data-driven beamforming techniques to attenuate ballistocardiogram (BCG) artefacts in EEG-fMRI without detecting cardiac pulses in electrocardiography (ECG) recordings 96%
- Maximizing Dissimilarity in Resting State detects Heterogeneous Subtypes in Healthy population associated with High Substance-Use and Problems in Antisocial Personality 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing EEG source reconstruction with concurrent fMRI-derived spatial priors 97%
- Phase-amplitude coupling and phase synchronization between medial temporal, frontal and posterior brain regions support episodic autobiographical memory recall 96%
- Modeling the hemodynamic response function using EEG-fMRI data during eyes-open resting-state conditions and motor task execution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model 96%
- Static and Dynamic Aspects of Cerebro-Cerebellar Functional Connectivity are Associated with Self-reported Measures of Impulsivity: A Resting-State fMRI Study 96%
- Unraveling reproducible dynamic states of individual brain functional parcellation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.