Back

Use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Characterize Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity

Venugopalan, V.; Nys, C.; Hurst, N.; Chen, Y.; Bruzzone, M.; Cherabuddi, K.; Iovine, N. M.; Liu, J.; Al-Shaer, M. H.; Scheetz, M. H.; Rhodes, N. J.; Peloquin, C. A.; Klinker, K. P.

2020-08-14 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2020.08.13.250456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe incidence of cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) in hospitalized patients is highly variable. Although greater cefepime exposures incite neurotoxicity, data evaluating trough thresholds associated with CIN remains limited. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of CIN, assess the relationship between cefepime trough concentrations and CIN, investigate clinical factors associated with CIN, and describe electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities in CIN. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult patients who had received [&ge;] 5 days of cefepime with [&ge;] 1 trough concentration > 25 mg/L. Potential CIN cases were identified utilizing neurological symptoms, neurologist assessments, EEG findings and improvement of neurotoxicity after cefepime discontinuation. ResultsOne-hundred and forty-two patients were included. The incidence of CIN was 13% (18/142). The mean cefepime trough concentration in CIN patients was significantly greater than the non-neurotoxicity group (74.2 mg/L {+/-} 41.1 vs. 46.6 mg/L {+/-} 23, p=0.015). Lower renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min), greater time to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) ([&ge;]72 hours), and each 1 mg/mL rise in cefepime trough were independently associated with increased risk of CIN. Moderate generalized slowing of the background rhythm was the most common EEG pattern associated with CIN. ConclusionCefepime should be used cautiously in hospitalized patients due to the risk of neurotoxicity. Patients with greater renal function and those who had early cefepime TDM ([&le;] 72 hours) had lower risk of CIN.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.6%
3
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
5
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%