Back

Timed mesodermal FGF and BMP govern the multi-step thyroid specification

Haerlingen, B.; Opitz, R.; Vandernoot, I.; Molinaro, A.; Shankar, M.; Gillotay, P.; Trubiroha, A.; Costagliola, S.

2020-08-13 developmental biology
10.1101/2020.08.13.249540 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Thyroid tissue is the site for de novo synthesis of thyroid hormones which are essential for vertebrate development and growth. Defects in embryonic thyroid morphogenesis are a predominant cause for congenital thyroid diseases but the molecular pathomechanisms are incompletely understood. The first molecularly recognizable step of thyroid development is the specification of thyroid precursors at a defined position in the anterior foregut endoderm. While recent studies identified FGF and BMP pathways as critical signaling factors for thyroid specification, the interplay between extrinsic signaling cues and thyroid transcription factor expression remained elusive. Here, we used zebrafish embryos to decipher the dynamics of thyroid transcription factor induction in relation to FGF and BMP signaling activities in pharyngeal endoderm. We first identified a previously unrecognized endodermal thyroid progenitor cell population expressing Pax2a but not Nkx2.4b. This cell population is characterized by enhanced FGF signaling but initially lacks detectable BMP signaling. A subpopulation of Pax2a-expressing progenitors differentiates subsequently into thyroid lineage-committed precursor cells co-expressing Pax2a and Nkx2.4b. We next combined pharmacological approaches with genetic models permitting inhibition or ectopic overactivation of signaling pathways to timely manipulate FGF and BMP activities. These experiments support a model where FGF signaling primarily regulates Pax2a expression whereas BMP signaling has dual functions in regulation of both Pax2a and Nkx2.4b expression. Collectively, our data allow us to formulate a refined model of thyroid cell specification from foregut endoderm.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.