Back

Results and Impact of Intensive SARS-CoV-2 Testing in a High Volume, Outpatient Radiation Oncology Clinic in a Pandemic Hotspot

McBride, S. M.; Bundick, K.; Hubbeling, H.; Freret, M.; Modlin, L.; Kamboj, M.; Cahlon, O.; Gomez, D.

2020-08-14 oncology
10.1101/2020.08.11.20172551 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn an attempt to reduce interruptions in radiation treatment, our department implemented universal SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing during the peak of the New York City COVID-19 epidemic. MethodsStarting 4/18/20, outpatients coming into the Department of Radiation Oncology for either simulation or brachytherapy were required to undergo PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. Starting on 5/6/20, patients were offered simultaneous SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody testing. ResultsBetween 4/18/20-6/25/20, 1360 patients underwent 1,401 outpatient screening visits (Table 1). Of the patients screened, 411 were screened between 4/18/20 and 5/6/20 (Phase 1) with PCR testing: 13 (3.1%) patients were PCR positive. From 5/7/20 to 6/25/20, 990 patients were scheduled for both PCR and antibody testing (Phase 2), including 41 previously screened in Phase 1. Of those with known antibody status (n=952), 5.5% were seropositive. After 5/21/20, no screened patient (n=605) tested PCR positive. In the month prior to screening (3/17/20-4/19/20), 24 of 625 patients initiating external radiation had treatment interrupted due to COVID-19 infection (3.8%) vs 7 of 600 patients (1.1%) in the month post screening (4/20/20-5/24/20) (p=0.002). O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fd270aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10e1f44org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@26b73corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c7e2feorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@79ad0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL O_FLOATNOTable 1:C_FLOATNO O_TABLECAPTIONDemographic and Disease Data C_TABLECAPTION C_TBL ConclusionsState-wide mitigation efforts, coupled with intensive departmental screening, helped prevent interruptions in radiation during the COVID-19 epidemic that could have compromised treatment efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.