Back

The role of toxin:antitoxin systems and insertion sequences in the loss of virulence in Shigella sonnei

Martyn, J. E.; Pilla, G.; Hollingshead, S.; Lobanovska, M.; Winther, K. S.; Lea, S.; McVicker, G.; Tang, C. M.

2020-08-12 microbiology
10.1101/2020.08.10.243006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Shigella plasmid, pINV, contains a 30 kb pathogenicity island (PAI) encoding a Type III secretion system (T3SS) which is essential for virulence. During growth in the laboratory, avirulent colonies of Shigella (which do not express a T3SS) arise spontaneously. Avirulence in Shigella flexneri mostly follows loss of the PAI, following recombination between insertion sequences (ISs) on pINV; toxin:antitoxin (TA) systems on pINV promote its retention through post-segregational killing (PSK). We show that avirulence in Shigella sonnei mainly results from plasmid loss, consistent with previous findings; IS-mediated PAI deletions can occur in S. sonnei, but through different ISs than in S. flexneri. We investigated the molecular basis for frequent loss of the S. sonnei plasmid, pINVSsonn. Introduction into pINVSsonn of CcdAB and GmvAT, toxin:antitoxin TA systems in pINV from S. flexneri but not S. sonnei, reduced plasmid loss and the emergence of avirulent bacteria. However, plasmid loss remained the leading cause of avirulence. We show that a single amino acid difference in the VapC toxin of the VapBC TA system in pINV also contributes to high frequency plasmid loss in S. sonnei compared to S. flexneri. Our findings demonstrate that the repertoire of ISs, complement of TA systems, and polymorphisms in TA systems influence plasmid dynamics and virulence loss in S. sonnei. Understanding the impact of polymorphisms should be informative about how TA systems contribute to PSK, and could be exploited for generating strains with stable plasmids.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.