Back

On the numbers of infected and deceased in the second Corona wave

Mimkes, J.; Janssen, R.

2020-08-11 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.08.10.20171553 medRxiv
Show abstract

SummaryIn Germany and other countries, a second wave of corona infections has been observed since July 2020, after the first wave has subsided. We have investigated both waves by a modified SIR-SI infection model, adapted to the data to the Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) or the Johns-Hopkins-University (JHU). The first wave is characterized by the SIR model: in a perfect lockdown only a small part of the society is infected and the infections end after a certain time. The SI part considers the incompleteness of any lockdown: at the end of the first wave infections do not completely go down to zero, but continue to rise again, but only slowly due to mouth protection, hygiene and distance keeping. During this first wave the number of deceased people follows the number of infected persons with a fixed time interval and percentage: mostly symptomatic ill people have been tested. This applied to nearly all countries observed, with different intervals and percentages. In the present second wave, the number of daily infections has risen again significantly in some countries, and it may be questioned whether this is due to the increased number of tests. The answer may be given by looking at the daily number of deaths. In Germany, Austria, Italy, Great Britain and others this number has still remained at a constant level for six weeks. In these countries a second wave of died people has not yet arrived. The increased number of tests include obviously mostly asymptomatically infected persons, who do not fall ill or die from coronavirus. However, in some countries, like USA or Israel, the second wave did arrive. The numbers of infected and deceased people both have grown. A real second wave is a permanent threat to all countries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
4
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
16
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
26
microLife
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%