Markedly heterogeneous COVID-19 testing plans among US colleges and universities
Booeshaghi, A. S.; Tan, F. H.; Renton, B.; Berger, Z.; Pachter, L.
Show abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic worsens in the United States [1], colleges that have invited students back for the fall are finalizing mitigation plans to lessen the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Even though students have largely been away from campuses over the summer, several outbreaks associated with colleges have already occurred [2], foreshadowing the scale of infection that could result from hundreds of thousands of students returning to college towns and cities. While many institutions have released return-to-campus plans designed to reduce viral spread and to rapidly identify outbreaks should they occur, in many cases communications by college administrators have been opaque. To contribute to an evaluation of university preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic, we assessed a crucial element: COVID-19 on-campus testing. We examined testing plans at more than 500 colleges and universities throughout the US, and collated statistics, as well as narratives from publicly facing websites. We discovered a highly variable and muddled state of COVID-19 testing plans among US institutions of higher education that has been shaped by discrepancies between scientific studies and federal guidelines. We highlight cases of divergence between university testing plans and public health best practices, as well as potential bioethical issues.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimal SARS-CoV-2 classroom transmission at a large urban university experiencing repeated into campus introduction 90%
- Control of COVID-19 transmission on an urban university campus during a second wave of the pandemic 90%
- Low prevalence of COVID-19 Exposure is Coincident with Self-reported Compliance with Public Health Guidelines among Essential Employees at an Institute of Higher Education 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 90%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 89%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking the CoVID-19 pandemic across countries and states in the U.S.A. under heterogeneous testing 90%
- Fitness tracking reveals task-specific associations between memory, mental health, and physical activity 88%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socio-educational Impact and Psychological Distress of Medical Students amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Japanese Cross-Sectional Survey 89%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 89%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.