Back

CRISPR/Cas9 technology abolishes the BCR/ABL1 oncogene effect in chronic myeloid leukemia and restores normal hematopoiesis

Vuelta, E.; Ordonez, J. L.; Alonso-Perez, V.; Mendez, L.; Hernandez-Carabias, P.; Saldana, R.; Sevilla, J.; Sebastian, E.; Muntion, S.; Sanchez-Guijo, F.; Hernandez-Rivas, J. M.; Garcia-Tunon, I.; Sanchez-Martin, M. A.

2020-09-04 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.08.05.237610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic stem cell disease produced by a unique oncogenic event involving the constitutively active tyrosine kinase (TK) BCR/ABL1. TK activity explains most features of CML, such as tumor development and maintenance. TK-inhibitory (TKI) drugs have changed its prognosis and natural history. Unfortunately, the ABL1 gene persists unaffected by TKIs, leukemic stem cells (LSCs) remains, resistant mutations arise and adverse effects may occur during treatment. To address this problem, we have designed a potential therapeutic alternative with CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing nucleases that target LSCs. The strategy was successfully developed in murine and human cell lines and finally was evaluated in primary LSCs isolated from CML transgenic mice and from CML patients. Mouse CML-LSCs edited were orthotopic transplanted in immunodeficient NSG niches where restored the normal hematopoiesis. Importantly, patient-derived xenografts with CD34+-LSCs edited, repopulated and restored the normal hematopoiesis in immunodeficient NSG niches. We show, for the first time, how CRISPR technology efficiently interrupts the BCR/ABL1 oncogene in murine and human LSCs to provide a significant therapeutic benefit. We propose human CML as a potential candidate for CRISPR therapy, providing proof-of-principle for genome editing in CML patients, and open new avenues for the application of this technique in other fusion genes. Key pointsCRISPR system destroys BCR/ABL oncogene and induces a therapeutic benefit in a CML mouse model and CML patient derived xenografts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
4
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
11
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
14
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%