Back

Transient dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 as England exited national lockdown

Riley, S.; Ainslie, K. E. C.; Eales, O.; Walters, C. E.; Wang, H.; Atchison, C. J.; Diggle, P.; Ashby, D.; Donnelly, C. A.; Cooke, G.; Barclay, W.; Ward, H.; Darzi, A.; Elliott, P.

2020-08-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.05.20169078 medRxiv
Show abstract

Control of the COVID-19 pandemic requires a detailed understanding of prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the population. Case-based surveillance is necessarily biased towards symptomatic individuals and sensitive to varying patterns of reporting in space and time. The real-time assessment of community transmission antigen study (REACT-1) is designed to overcome these limitations by obtaining prevalence data based on a nose and throat swab RT-PCR test among a representative community-based sample in England, including asymptomatic individuals. Here, we describe results comparing rounds 1 and 2 carried out during May and mid June / early July 2020 respectively across 315 lower tier local authority areas. In round 1 we found 159 positive samples from 120,620 tested swabs while round 2 there were 123 positive samples from 159,199 tested swabs, indicating a downwards trend in prevalence from 0.13% (95% CI, 0.11%, 0.15%) to 0.077% (0.065%, 0.092%), a halving time of 38 (28, 58) days, and an R of 0.89 (0.86, 0.93). The proportion of swab-positive participants who were asymptomatic at the time of sampling increased from 69% (61%, 76%) in round 1 to 81% (73%, 87%) in round 2. Although health care and care home workers were infected far more frequently than other workers in round 1, the odds were markedly reduced in round 2. Age patterns of infection changed between rounds, with a reduction by a factor of five in prevalence in 18 to 24 year olds. Our data were suggestive of increased risk of infection in Black and Asian (mainly South Asian) ethnicities. Using regional and detailed case location data, we detected increased infection intensity in and near London. Under multiple sensitivity analyses, our results were robust to the possibility of false positives. At the end of the initial lockdown in England, we found continued decline in prevalence and a shift in the pattern of infection by age and occupation. Community-based sampling, including asymptomatic individuals, is necessary to fully understand the nature of ongoing transmission.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
17
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%