Transient dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 as England exited national lockdown
Riley, S.; Ainslie, K. E. C.; Eales, O.; Walters, C. E.; Wang, H.; Atchison, C. J.; Diggle, P.; Ashby, D.; Donnelly, C. A.; Cooke, G.; Barclay, W.; Ward, H.; Darzi, A.; Elliott, P.
Show abstract
Control of the COVID-19 pandemic requires a detailed understanding of prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the population. Case-based surveillance is necessarily biased towards symptomatic individuals and sensitive to varying patterns of reporting in space and time. The real-time assessment of community transmission antigen study (REACT-1) is designed to overcome these limitations by obtaining prevalence data based on a nose and throat swab RT-PCR test among a representative community-based sample in England, including asymptomatic individuals. Here, we describe results comparing rounds 1 and 2 carried out during May and mid June / early July 2020 respectively across 315 lower tier local authority areas. In round 1 we found 159 positive samples from 120,620 tested swabs while round 2 there were 123 positive samples from 159,199 tested swabs, indicating a downwards trend in prevalence from 0.13% (95% CI, 0.11%, 0.15%) to 0.077% (0.065%, 0.092%), a halving time of 38 (28, 58) days, and an R of 0.89 (0.86, 0.93). The proportion of swab-positive participants who were asymptomatic at the time of sampling increased from 69% (61%, 76%) in round 1 to 81% (73%, 87%) in round 2. Although health care and care home workers were infected far more frequently than other workers in round 1, the odds were markedly reduced in round 2. Age patterns of infection changed between rounds, with a reduction by a factor of five in prevalence in 18 to 24 year olds. Our data were suggestive of increased risk of infection in Black and Asian (mainly South Asian) ethnicities. Using regional and detailed case location data, we detected increased infection intensity in and near London. Under multiple sensitivity analyses, our results were robust to the possibility of false positives. At the end of the initial lockdown in England, we found continued decline in prevalence and a shift in the pattern of infection by age and occupation. Community-based sampling, including asymptomatic individuals, is necessary to fully understand the nature of ongoing transmission.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Global surveillance of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants 92%
- Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in a rural and urban community household cohort in South Africa, during the first and second waves July 2020-March 2021 91%
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 variants spread detected in France using specific RT-PCR testing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 incidence, transmission and reinfection in a rural and an urban setting: results of the PHIRST-C cohort study, South Africa, 2020-2021 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in educational settings: cross-sectional analysis of clusters and outbreaks in England 92%
- Serology-informed estimates of SARS-COV-2 infection fatality risk in Geneva, Switzerland 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant, infection rates, antibody seroconversion and seroprevalence rates in secondary school students and staff: active prospective surveillance, December 2020 to March 2021, England 93%
- Estimates of the rate of infection and asymptomatic COVID-19 disease in a population sample from SE England 92%
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in healthcare workers and other staff at North Bristol NHS Trust: a sociodemographic analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.