Paediatric Attendances and Acuity in the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Rose, K.; Van-Zyl, K.; Cotton, R.; Wallace, S.; Cleugh, F.
Show abstract
AimTo investigate the difference in both numbers and acuity of presentations to the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) during the peak time period of the current global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. DesignThis single centre retrospective observational study used routinely collected electronic health data to compare patient presentation characteristics between 21st March and 26th April 2020 compared to the equivalent time period in 2019. ResultsThere was a 90% decrease in attendances to PED, with a 10.23% reduction re-attendance rate. Children presenting were younger during the pandemic, with a median age difference of 2 years. They were more likely to present in an ambulance (9.63%), be admitted to hospital (5.75%) and be assigned the highest two Manchester triage categories (6.26%). There was a non-significant trend towards longer lengths of stay. The top 10 presenting complaints remained constant (although the order changed) between time periods. There was no difference in mortality or admission to PICU. ImplicationsOur data demonstrates that there has been a significant decrease in numbers of children seeking emergency department care. It suggests that presenting patients were proportionally sicker during the pandemic; however, we would argue that this is more in keeping with appropriate acuity for PED presentations, as there were no differences in PICU admission rate or mortality. We explore some of the possible reasons behind the decrease in presentations and the implications for service planning ahead of the winter months.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 89%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 89%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 91%
- Effect of covid-19 lockdown on child protection medical assessments: a retrospective observational study in Birmingham, UK. 91%
- Developing a video expert panel as a reference standard to evaluate respiratory rate counting in paediatric pneumonia diagnosis: protocol for a cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with low school readiness, a linked health and education data study in Wales, UK 91%
- Risks for death after admission to pediatric intensive care (PICU) - a comparison with the general population 91%
- Non-COVID-19 patients in times of pandemic: decreased emergency department visits and increased out-of-hospital mortality in Northern Italy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 92%
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 91%
- Child Mortality in England During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.