Back

Sequential onset and concurrent expression of miR-9 genomic loci in single cells contributes to the temporal increase of mature miR-9 in zebrafish neurogenesis

Soto, X.; Minchington, T.; Lea, R.; Lee, J.; Papalopulu, N.

2020-08-03 developmental biology
10.1101/2020.08.03.233890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) have important quantitative roles in tuning dynamical gene expression. Hes/Her transcription factor dynamics are sensitive to the increasing amount of miR-9 in the cell, transitioning from noisy high-level expression to oscillatory expression and then to downregulation. However, the mechanism by which miR-9 is quantitatively controlled is not known. In vertebrates, several distinct genomic loci produce the same mature miR-9, but the functional significance of multiple primary transcripts remains unknown. Here, we show that the amount of mature miR-9 increases during zebrafish neurogenesis in a sharp stepwise manner. We characterize the spatiotemporal profile of 7 distinct pri-mir-9s and show that they are sequentially expressed during hindbrain neurogenesis. Quantitative analysis of expression at the single-cell level, shows that expression of late-onset pri-mir-9-1 is added on, rather than replacing the expression of early onset pri-mir-9-4 and 9-5. Mutating the late-onset pri-mir-9-1 with CRISPR/Cas9 prevents the developmental increase of mature miR-9 and reduces late neuronal differentiation. Finally, we use mathematical modelling to explore possible benefits of a stepwise increase of miR-9 over a linear increase. We find that an adaptive network containing Her6 can be insensitive to a linear increase in miR-9 and show that such adaptation can be overcome by step-wise increases of miR-9. In conclusion, our work suggests that a sharp stepwise increase of mature miR-9 is contributed by sequential temporal activation of distinct loci. This may be a strategy to overcome adaptation and facilitate a transition to a new state of Her6 dynamics or level.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.