Back

Sweet anticipation: Predictability of familiar music in autism

Da Mota, P. A.; Stark, E. A.; Fernandes, H. M.; Ahrends, C.; Cabral, J.; Gebauer, L.; Happe, F.; Vuust, P.; Kringelbach, M. L.

2020-08-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.08.03.233668 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Autism has been characterised by different behavioural and cognitive profiles compared to typically developing (TD) individuals, and increasingly these differences have been associated with differences in structural and functional brain connectivity. It is currently unknown as to whether autistic and TD listeners process music in the same way: emotionally, mnemonically, and perceptually. The present study explores the brains dynamical landscape linked to music familiarity in an fMRI dataset from autistic and TD individuals. Group analysis using leading eigenvector dynamics analysis (LEiDA) revealed significantly higher probability of occurrence of a brain network in TD compared to autistic individuals during listening to familiar music. This network includes limbic and paralimbic areas (amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and temporal pole). No significant differences were found between autistic and TD individuals while listening to a scrambled, i.e. unfamiliar and more unpredictable, version of the same music track. These findings provide novel neuroimaging insights into how autistic prediction monitoring may shape brain networks during listening to familiar musical excerpts.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
○ 85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Autism Research
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
3
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
NeuroImage: Clinical
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Cerebral Cortex
◐ 396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
11
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
12
Molecular Autism
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
○ 189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
○ 96 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Cortex
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Brain Topography
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
18
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
19
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
20
Biological Psychology
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
◐ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
23
Brain Sciences
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
International Journal of Psychophysiology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Psychiatry
○ 87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Psychological Medicine
◐ 88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
● 13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
28
Neuroscience
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Cerebral Cortex Communications
◐ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
Network Neuroscience
● 126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.