Back

Functional Predictors of Causative Cis-Regulatory Mutations in Mendelian Disease

Bengani, H.; Grozeva, D.; Moyon, L.; Bhatia, S.; Louros, S. R.; Hope, J.; Jackson, A.; Prendergast, J.; Owen, L. J.; Naville, M.; Rainger, J.; Grimes, G.; Halachev, M.; Murphy, L. C.; Boskovic, O. S.; Heyningen, V. v.; Kind, P.; Abbott, C. M.; Osterweil, E.; Raymond, L.; Roest Crollius, H.; FitzPatrick, D.

2020-08-03 genetics
10.1101/2020.08.03.232926 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Undiagnosed neurodevelopmental disease is significantly associated with rare variants in cis-regulatory elements (CRE) but demonstrating causality is challenging as target gene consequences may differ from a causative variant affecting the coding region. Here, we address this challenge by applying a procedure to discriminate likely diagnostic regulatory variants from those of neutral/low-penetrant effect. We identified six rare CRE variants using targeted and whole genome sequencing in 48 unrelated males with apparent X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) but without detectable coding region variants. These variants segregated appropriately in families and altered conserved bases in predicted CRE targeting known XLID genes. Three were unique and three were rare but too common to be plausibly causative for XLID. We compared the cis-regulatory activity of wild-type and mutant alleles in zebrafish embryos using dual-color fluorescent reporters. Two variants showed striking changes: one plausibly causative (FMR1CRE) and the other likely neutral/low-penetrant (TENM1CRE). These variants were "knocked-in" to mice and both altered embryonic neural expression of their target gene. Only Fmr1CRE mice showed disease-relevant behavioral defects. FMR1CRE is plausibly disease-associated resulting in complex misregulation of Fmr1/FMRP rather than loss-of-function. This is consistent both with absence of Fragile X syndrome in the probands and the observed electrophysiological anomalies in the FMR1CRE mouse brain. Although disruption of in vivo patterns of endogenous gene expression in disease-relevant tissues by CRE variants cannot be used as strong evidence for Mendelian disease association, in conjunction with extreme rarity in human populations and with relevant knock-in mouse phenotypes, such variants can become likely pathogenic.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.4%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.5%
10
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
14
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
16
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
21
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.5%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.5%
24
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
28
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%