Back

Mechanism of duplex unwinding by coronavirus nsp13 helicases

Hu, X.; Hao, W.; Qin, B.; Tian, Z.; Li, Z.; Hou, P.; Zhao, R.; Cui, S.; Diao, J.

2020-08-03 biophysics
10.1101/2020.08.02.233510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic urges in-depth investigation into proteins encoded with coronavirus (CoV), especially conserved CoV replicases. The nsp13 of highly pathogenic MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and SARS-CoV exhibit the most conserved CoV replicases. Using single-molecule FRET, we observed that MERS-CoV nsp13 unwound DNA in discrete steps of approximately 9 bp when ATP was used. If another NTP was used, then the steps were only 4 to 5 bp. In dwell time analysis, we detected 3 or 4 hidden steps in each unwinding process, which indicated the hydrolysis of 3 or 4 dTTP. Based on crystallographic and biochemical studies of CoV nsp13 helicases, we modeled an unwinding mechanism similar to the spring-loaded mechanism of HCV NS3 helicase, although our model proposes that flexible 1B and stalk domains, by allowing a lag greater than 4 bp during unwinding, cause the accumulated tension on the nsp13-DNA complex. The hinge region between two RecA-like domains in SARS-CoV-2 nsp13 is intrinsically more flexible than in MERS-CoV nsp13 due to the difference of a single amino acid, which causes the former to induce significantly greater NTP hydrolysis. Our findings thus establish a blueprint for determining the unwinding mechanism of a unique helicase family. O_LIWhen dTTP was used as the energy source, 4 hidden steps in each individual unwinding step after 3 - 4 NTP hydrolysis were observed. C_LIO_LIAn unwinding model of MERS-CoV-nsp13 which is similar to the spring-loaded mechanism of HCV NS3 helicase, except the accumulation of tension on nsp13/DNA complex is caused by the flexible 1B and stalk domains that allow a lag of 4-bp in unwinding. C_LIO_LIComparing to MERS-CoV nsp13, the hinge region between two RecA-like domains in SARS-CoV-2 nsp13 is intrinsically more flexible due to a single amino acid difference, which contributes to the significantly higher NTP hydrolysis by SARS-CoV-2 nsp13. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.2%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
Biophysics and Physicobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
11
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
19
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
24
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%