A multi-centre prospective study of COVID-19 transmission following outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the United Kingdom
Hayee, B.; The SCOTS project group, ; East, J. E.; Rees, C. R.; Penman, I.
Show abstract
MessageThe COVID-19 pandemic has severely curtailed the practice of endoscopy (as an exemplar for outpatient diagnostic procedures) worldwide. Restart and recovery processes will be influenced by the need to protect patients and staff from disease transmission, but data on the risk of COVID-19 transmission after endoscopy are sparse. This is of particular importance in later pandemic phases when the risk of harm from delayed or missed significant diagnoses is likely to far outweigh the risk of infection. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidance for restarting endoscopy included stratification of diagnostic procedures according to aerosol generation or assessment of infectious risk as well as pragmatic guidance on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). We sought to document the risk of COVID-19 transmission after endoscopy in this "COVID-minimised" environment. Prospective data were collected from 18 UK centres for n=6208 procedures. Pre-endoscopy, 3/2611 (0.11% [95% CI: 0.00-0.33%]) asymptomatic patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab. Based on follow-up telephone symptom screening of patients at 7 and 14 days, no cases of COVID-19 were detected by any centre after endoscopy in either patients or staff. While these data cannot determine the relative contribution of each component of a COVID-minimised pathway, they provide clear support for such an approach. The rational use of PPE and infection control policies should be continued and will aid planning for outpatient diagnostics in the COVID-19 recovery phase.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 92%
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 90%
- Optimising Early Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologics Era: Admission Model for Intensification of Therapy in Acute Severe Colitis (ADMIT–ASC) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 93%
- Nonendoscopic Detection Of Barrett’S Esophagus In Patients Without Gerd Symptoms 90%
- Appropriate management of steroids and discharge planning during and after hospital admission for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal infection trends in England, February – July 2020 90%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 88%
- Prescribing patterns for medical treatment of suspected prostatic obstruction: A spatiotemporal statistical analysis of Scottish open access data 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 88%
- "GERPACYST- The Trial Protocol Of The Prospective, Multicenter, Interdisciplinary German Pancreas Club Cyst Registry" 88%
- Colorectal cancer in patients with single versus double positive faecal immunochemical test results: A retrospective cohort study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.