Back

Analytical and clinical performances of five immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in comparison with neutralization activity

Plebani, M.; Padoan, A.; Sciacovelli, L.; Bonfante, F.; Pagliari, M.; Bozzato, D.; Cosma, C.; Bortolami, A.; Negrini, D.; Zuin, S.

2020-08-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.01.20166546
Show abstract

BackgroundReliable high-throughput serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Abs) are urgently needed for the effective containment of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it is of crucial importance to understand the strength and duration of immunity after infection, and to make informed decisions concerning the activation or discontinuation of physical distancing restrictions. MethodsIn 184 serum samples from 130 COVID-19 patients and 54 SARS-CoV-2 negative subjects, the analytical and clinical performances of four commercially available chemiluminescent assays (Abbott SARS-Cov-2 IgG, Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2, Ortho SARS-CoV-2 total and IgG) and one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Diesse ENZY-WELL SARS-CoV-2 IgG) were evaluated and compared with the neutralization activity achieved using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). FindingsPrecision results ranged from 0.9% to 11.8% for all assays. Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated linearity of results at concentrations within the cut-off value. Overall, sensitivity ranged from 78.5 to 87.8%, and specificity, from 97.6 to 100%. On limiting the analysis to samples collected 12 days after onset of symptoms, the sensitivity of all assays increased, the highest value (95.2%) being obtained with VITRO Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total and Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The strongest PRNT50 correlation with antibody levels was obtained with ENZY-Well SARS-CoV-2 IgG (rho = 0.541, p < 0.001). InterpretationThe results confirmed that all immunoassays had an excellent specificity, whereas sensitivity varied across immunoassays, depending strongly on the time interval between symptoms onset and sample collection. Further studies should be conducted to achieve a stronger correlation between antibody measurement and PRNT50 in order to obtain useful information for providing effective passive antibody therapy, and developing a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.1%
10.9%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 51%
10.0%
3
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 1%
5.7%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 41%
4.6%
6
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 6%
2.8%
12
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
14
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
2.4%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
16
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Infectious Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
based on 18 papers
Top 0.9%
1.3%
20
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 9%
1.2%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Microorganisms
based on 21 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 20%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
27
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%