Generative probabilistic biological sequence models that account for mutational variability
Weinstein, E. N.; Marks, D. S.
Show abstract
Generative probabilistic modeling of biological sequences has widespread existing and potential application across biology and biomedicine, from evolutionary biology to epidemiology to protein design. Many standard sequence analysis methods preprocess data using a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) algorithm, one of the most widely used computational methods in all of science. However, as we show in this article, training generative probabilistic models with MSA preprocessing leads to statistical pathologies in the context of sequence prediction and forecasting. To address these problems, we propose a principled drop-in alternative to MSA preprocessing in the form of a structured observation distribution (the ``MuE" distribution). The MuE is a latent alignment model in which not only the alignment variable but also the regressor sequence can be latent. We prove theoretically that the MuE distribution comprehensively generalizes popular methods for inferring biological sequence alignments, and provide a precise characterization of how such biological models have differed from natural language latent alignment models. We show empirically that models that use the MuE as an observation distribution outperform comparable methods across a variety of datasets, and apply MuE models to a novel problem for generative probabilistic sequence models: forecasting pathogen evolution.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping the gene space at single-cell resolution with gene signal pattern analysis 95%
- Adversarial domain translation networks for fast and accurate integration of large-scale atlas-level single-cell datasets 95%
- Unconstrained generation of synthetic antibody-antigen structures to guide machine learning methodology for real-world antibody specificity prediction 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.